> It appears to be legit, though the download link is broken. I tried to > download it in order to compare the checksum on the downloaded version > to the published checksum to be sure they were offering the real thing. > > But the spam or ham question is one of personal preference. (That's > part of the reason for SpamBayes!) If you would like to see future > messages like this, file it as ham. Otherwise, spam.
Jesse, I know. I'm rather tolerant. If the download link would have worked and the checksum would have been OK, I would have classified this as ham. It is the job of a good webmaster to make sure links are not broken. So, good webmaster = good email; lazy webmaster = bad email, ergo spam. Thank you for testing the download link, it helped me to decide. -- Amedee _______________________________________________ SpamBayes@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html