Op vrijdag 05-01-2007 om 15:19 uur [tijdzone +1000], schreef Bill Hely: > > Anyway, it's for Exchange (mailservers), and Spambayes isn't: > > it is for the end user with his individual mail client. > > Yes, I understand that. My point was that some vendors are > specifically claiming good success with image spam, whereas my > experience is that SpamBayes doesn't handle it too well. > > > It already does that for me. Doesn't it do that for you? > > There's one particular type of image spam I get hundreds of every > month. It's an image promo for an investment stock. The specific > stock promoted changes almost daily. The image is always followed > by a large amount of non-spam-type text on various subjects, > which is apparently what fools SpamBayes. It catches a few of > these, but misses an awful lot, and (subjectively) doesn't seem > to be improving. More often than not these messages get rated at > 0%. > > I have a stock of these spam messages if anyone wants to look at > them.
SpamBayes catches all of those on my box. > > What version do you use? > > I've been using the Outlook plug-in for years. Been on v1.0.4 > since not long after it was released. You are using an ancient version. I am using version 1.1a3 as a procmail filter on Linux. Version 1.1a3 also exists as a Windows version (including Outlook pluging). PS: please reply to the list. -- Amedee Van Gasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
