Hi all, I've just started using spambayes again after a while away from it. Now, 3 days in, I notice that I've trained on far more spam than ham. (Total emails trained: Spam: *432* Ham: *64) I seem to remember that this was previously my experience in the past.
My question is; has anybody really tested the assertion that leads to the message: "**Warning: you have much more spam than ham - SpamBayes works best with approximately even numbers of ham and spam."?* * For the record, my statistics so far are: *SpamBayes has processed 5411 messages - 1279 (24%) good, 3189 (59%) spam and 943 (17%) unsure. Thanks, Brendon. _______________________________________________ SpamBayes@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
