"michael lefevre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
9d3u4j$84o$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9d3u4j$84o$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> istr this request was made previously and he wasn't keen... there's no
easy
> way of blocking messages based on size with plain SMTP - the server would
> have to accept the whole message, and then reject it, bounce it or
bitbucket
> it afterwards...
>
Right, once the server accepted it Julian had already used the bandwidth, so
rejecting after the fact saves the user fuel, but saves J nada.
_______________________________________________
SpamCop-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-list
