No, the "reject-ip-in-cc-rdns" filter won't stop these names because 
they end in ".net", which is a three-character TLD.  If they ended in a 
two-character TLD like ".us", it would work.

-- Sam Clippinger

Felix Bünemann wrote:
> Hello Sam,
>
> I assumed this should be blocked by the IP_IN_CC_RDNS rule, but  
> apparently it isn't.
>
> -- Felix
>
> Am 19.09.2008 um 00:47 schrieb Sam Clippinger:
>
>   
>> That rDNS name should be blocked, assuming that your keyword file
>> contains at least one of the following entries:
>>    dip
>>    .t-dialin.net
>>    .dip.t-dialin.net
>>
>> -- Sam Clippinger
>>
>> Felix Bünemann wrote:
>>     
>>> I just took a look at the code and found a segment which should
>>> already take care of this:
>>>
>>>     /*
>>>      * This block looks for the IP address as a sequence of hex  
>>> bytes.
>>>      * For example, if the IP is 85.135.72.234, this block looks for
>>>      * 5080d7e3.
>>>      */
>>>     if (!return_value)
>>>       {
>>>       tmp_strlen = snprintf(tmp_ip, MAX_IP, "%.2x%.2x%.2x%.2x",
>>> ip_ints[0], ip_ints[1], ip_ints[2], ip_ints[3]);
>>>
>>>       SPAMDYKE_LOG_EXCESSIVE(current_settings, LOG_DEBUGX_IP_IN_RDNS,
>>> tmp_strlen, tmp_ip, strlen_target_name, target_name);
>>>       if (strstr(target_name, tmp_ip) != NULL)
>>>         return_value = 1;
>>>       }
>>>     }
>>>
>>>
>>> So I wonder why the host listed below was matched by
>>> FILTER_BLACKLIST_NAME. I was under the impression that
>>> FILTER_IP_IN_CC_RDNS has a higher precedence than the blacklist file,
>>> but I might be misatken.
>>>
>>> Please shed some light on this Sam.
>>>
>>> -- Felix
>>>
>>> Am 19.09.2008 um 00:16 schrieb Felix Bünemann:
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that spamdyke 4.0.4 is not blocking dialup hosts which use
>>>> hex-encoded ip-adress in their RDNS.
>>>>
>>>> T-Online, the biggeste German internet provider uses this scheme:
>>>>
>>>> 87.150.36.222 rdns: p579624de.dip.t-dialin.net
>>>>
>>>> 87=0x57 150=0x96 36=0x24 222=0xDE
>>>>
>>>> Should be pretty easy to add support for this.
>>>>
>>>> -- Felix Buenemann
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> spamdyke-dev mailing list
>>>> spamdyke-dev@spamdyke.org
>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-dev
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spamdyke-dev mailing list
>>> spamdyke-dev@spamdyke.org
>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-dev
>>>
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> spamdyke-dev mailing list
>> spamdyke-dev@spamdyke.org
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-dev
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-dev mailing list
> spamdyke-dev@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-dev
>   
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-dev mailing list
spamdyke-dev@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-dev

Reply via email to