I'm not familiar with qsheff, so I hadn't given any thought to trying to replace it. Personally, I use qmail-scanner (qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net).
I've occasionally thought about providing hooks to integrate content scanners but my TODO list has a lot of bigger items on it right now. This might be a neat feature if I ever finally extend spamdyke into a daemonized SMTP proxy -- it would let Exchange administrators use SpamAssassin, for example. I'll keep it in mind. -- Sam Clippinger Steve Cole wrote: > qsheff hasn't been updated in about a year, and the last released version > will > kill your mail server (literally) with e-mail eating bugs. if someone was > willing to take this under their wing and maybe just rip out the > functionality other than anti-virus, that would be cool ;) > > in all seriousness, it looks to me like shortly clamav or one of the other > tools will be updated and qsheff won't be able to check for viruses > anymore... qsheff remains the only program of its type that I know of which > can keep up with a busy mail server - the rest all seem to be implemented > through perl or python, which kills the performance of the system > > thoughts? sam, are you interested in a one-two punch or do you plan to add > antivirus to your daemonized version? this fan of spamdyke would love to > know :) > _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
