Hello everybody,
I hope this is not a FAQ , I'd like to know if there is some reason
to prefer rbl to rhsbl .
Wouldn't it be nice to write down a list of options with explained
how much is the risk of rejecting good mail ?
for example in my configuration I've not enabled these options and
would like to know if they could generate many false positive:
reject-empty-rdns
reject-missing-sender-mx
reject-unresolvable-rdns
reject-ip-in-cc-rdns
Maybe it could be useful to make a survey of people's enabled options
and most used rbl ?
Thank you
Ciao
Paolo
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
