On 2/8/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>  >> I
>  >> > >  personally disagree with DJB's position about strictly
>  interpreting
>  >> > >  the
>  >> > >  RFCs -- I believe software should strictly follow RFCs when
>  producing
>  >> > >  output and loosely follow them when accepting it.
>  > >
>  > > This is a highly rational approach.  DJB ought to look at it this
>  way as
>  > > well.
>
>  I think keeping standards is important on both sides.
>

Okay in altruistic theory, but pragmatically isn't Sam's approach 
better?  What is put *out* onto the net has more importance for RFC 
compliance, don't you think?

Bucky



_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to