"ALLOWED_GRAYLISTED" could be useful if graylisting isn't active for all 
domains.  It would mean that the graylisting filter had checked for the 
existence of a graylist file for that connection (and found one).  I 
agree it should be possible to match an "ALLOWED" with a previous 
"DENIED_GRAYLISTED" but that could involve searching log files from 
multiple days if the remote server doesn't attempt redelivery very quickly.

-- Sam Clippinger

Michael Colvin wrote:
> Doesn't it already log "DENIED GREYLISTED" when it greylists an address,
> then when it is sent again, and passes the greylist test, it logs
> "ALLOWED"...  Doesn't that already identify greylisted e-mails?  Or, are we
> talking about logging the fact that e-mails are allowed AND have already
> been greylisted?  Which, if you greylist all domains, would be every e-mail,
> right?
>
> The "ALLOWED_WHITELISTED_*" items might be useful, but I don't see where
> logging allowed greylisted e-mails makes sense...  In fact, "Allowed
> Greylist" seems kind of contradictory to me...  :-)  Just my .02, which,
> with the state of the dollar, is worth even less today than last week.  :-)
>  
>
> Michael J. Colvin
> NorCal Internet Services
> www.norcalisp.com
>
>  
>
>
>
>  
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of BC
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 1:32 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Greylisting wishes
>>
>>
>> On 4/23/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>     
>>>  I could do that if it would be useful.  Now is the time 
>>>       
>> for changes  
>>     
>>> like  this, since version 4.0 won't be backwards compatible 
>>>       
>> anyway.  
>>     
>>> What  about changing the log message for other reasons too?  For 
>>> example,  ALLOWED_WHITELISTED_IP, ALLOWED_WHITELISTED_SENDER, etc.
>>>       
>> I'd like to see that sort of addition to the logging, too.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bucky
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>   
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to