Hi,

on my server i didn't use both filter so far. Most connections were 
block by RBL-Match. But when i saw i what order the filters are used (i 
also missed that like Eric), i switched both on again. When it save 
time, why not use it?

Nevertheless, also with both filter disabled, spamdyke has blocked 96% 
and more connections.

I use a dnswl, ip whitelist and some (less than 5) senders i have 
whitelisted.
No Problems were reported by my users. Everyone i happy, that almost 
*no* spam is comming in.

I love spamdyke!

Regards,
Arne

Sam Clippinger schrieb:
> I can't speak for anyone else, but those two filters have been very good 
> for my users.  On a typical day, 30-60% of all connections to my server 
> are blocked with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS.  Another 5-20% are blocked by 
> DENIED_IP_IN_RDNS.  I've had to whitelist a few IP addresses with bad 
> rDNS names but that's been very rare so far (less than 5 total).
>
> However, servers with larger user populations and more international 
> correspondence might have different experiences.
>
> -- Sam Clippinger
>
> Marcin Orlowski wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> Anyone by any chance did sort of research if DENIED_IP_IN_*_RDNS helps
>> his users or causes more problems? I formerly thought that this is
>> more helpful, as IP in RDNS is most likely appear for home dsls, dialups
>> and other stuff not supposed to run smtp server i shall trust, and if
>> it's my users mail netline, then they shall authenticate while talkign 
>> to me anyway. But now I see that some telecoms offer dsls with static 
>> IPs (contrary to dyniamic one, rotated 24hs, that is addressed to home 
>> users) which is primarily used by companies, and therefore it's less 
>> likely for them to be spam source (due to botnes, zombies etc). I even 
>> saw a data center which named their rack hosts that way. I therefore 
>> think that it might be extremely useful to try to build a kind of 
>> database of providers who one may consider whitelisting even, they would 
>> otherwise fall into IP_IN_RDNS or IP_IN_CC_RDNS trap. Any thoughts?
>>
>> Marcin
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to