I can't remember but i think the correct way is:

smtp-auth-command-encryption=/var/qmail/bin/smtp_auth
smtp-auth-command-encryption=/bin/true

smtp-auth-command-encryption=/var/qmail/bin/cmd5checkpw
smtp-auth-command-encryption= /bin/true

or smtp-auth-command-encryption=/var/qmail/bin/smtp_auth /bin/true
smtp-auth-command-encryption=/var/qmail/bin/cmd5checkpw /bin/true

Regards.

Nightduke




2008/5/12, nightduke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>  Try this...
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00460.html
>
> For me works.
>
> Regards.
>
> Nightduke
>
> 2008/5/12, [PIKOS] Gero Bressel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > > > What's your problem? Can you explain?
> > >
> > > i have on all of our PLESK-servers a problem the with SSL
> > > support. TLS works fine so far. But if a client trys to
> > > connect via port 465 the connection give an timeout (connection died).
> >
> > Spamdyke does support TLS, but doesn't support SSL so far. Even if there
> > is not that much difference in security of the encryption, the handshake
> > is different.
> >
> > If you use SSL-Encryption, the encryption is done before SMTP-Handshake
> > (helo, rcpt-to etc.), TLS is started with a special command during
> > handshake (after helo replyed with the availability of TLS).
> >
> > Spamdyke does not support SSL, so I don't use spamdyke on my 465 SSL
> > Port - but don't worry, I never have seen spam via 465 and SSL. It is
> > much to "expensive" (CPU power) for the spammers to use SSL for spam for
> > the senders and a problem for the viruses to implement it. And most MTA
> > I know just use Port 25 and TLS - the 465 with SSL ist mostly used by my
> > customers to use authenticated SMTP.
> >
> >
> > All the best,
> > Gero
> > _______________________________________________
> > spamdyke-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to