I use softlimit to run qmail, I had only 9MB asigned, now I have 32MB, and 
now spamdyke answer with DENIED_RELAYING


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "nightduke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "spamdyke users" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 6:17 AM
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] RCPTHOST not procesd,mail to NON local domains 
are accepted [ver 3 & 4]


> Pablo what was the problem?
>
> 2008/7/15 Pablo Murillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> NOW is working!!!, on version 4, not 3, but this is not a trouble right 
>> now
>> And all was for memory limit!!!!
>> I never think in that!!!
>> Years don't come alone :D
>>
>> THANKS SAM!
>>
>> I will send some statics from our servers later (now, we have 6 MXs
>> working!!!!)
>>
>> Debugin output for version 4
>> -------------------------------------------
>> 07/15/2008 18:27:14 LOG OUTPUT
>> DEBUG(filter_recipient_relay()@filter.c:2176): checking relaying;
>> relay-level: 3 recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ip: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx rdns:
>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx local_recipient: false relaying_allowed:
>> false
>> FILTER_RELAYING
>> DEBUG(filter_recipient_local()@filter.c:2147): checking for unqualified
>> recipient; recipient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> 07/15/2008 18:27:14 FROM SPAMDYKE TO REMOTE: 69 bytes
>> 554 Refused. Sending to remote addresses (relaying) is not allowed.
>>
>> 07/15/2008 18:27:14 LOG OUTPUT
>> DENIED_RELAYING from: (unknown) to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] origin_ip:
>> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx origin_rdns: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx auth:
>> (unknown)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Sam Clippinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "spamdyke users" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 5:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] RCPTHOST not procesd, mail to NON local
>> domains are accepted [ver 3 & 4]
>>
>>
>>> So with spamdyke 4.0.0, no one is ever blocked for relaying and it
>>> doesn't matter whether you use the "access-file" option?
>>>
>>> I think the problem might be the memory limit.  You're using "softlimit"
>>> to set the maximum memory usage to 9 MB, which is pretty low.  On my
>>> server, for example, I use "softlimit" to allow 80 MB.  A low limit can
>>> cause some strange problems and it's rare to actually see an "out of
>>> memory" error.
>>>
>>> If that doesn't do it, try turning on the "full-log-dir" and
>>> "access-file" options and running your test with version 4.0.0.  The log
>>> file should show all of the debugging output and (hopefully) show what
>>> the problem is.
>>>
>>> -- Sam Clippinger
>>>
>>> Pablo Murillo wrote:
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> I have the same probklem, but this time (with version 4), is worse
>>>> I'm sending my .conf, tcp.smtp, rcpthost & run (supervise smtp)
>>>> I will try to explain what I do.
>>>>
>>>> I DON'T use smtp-auth because these servers are MTA, no SMTP for
>>>> clients. This servers "act" as OPEN RELAY, because there are my MX
>>>> servers, these servers RECEIVE mail to my CLIENTS, these are not the
>>>> SMTP servers that use my clients. This server (after receiving mail)
>>>> use SMTPROUTES to redistribnute the mails inside the rest of my
>>>> network (qmail-send - qmail-smtp - qmail-queue - qmail-local - MAILDIR)
>>>>
>>>> I don't know if I'm explaining well, this is a bit confusing
>>>>
>>>> Another 2 tips:
>>>> 1.- this is running under FreeBSD 7
>>>> 2.- we receive around 1.000.000 CONNECTIOS!!! per day!, yes 1 millon,
>>>> 50% direct spam to 3 account (blacklisted recipient), can you believe
>>>> it ?
>>>>
>>>> A "graphical" explanation:
>>>>
>>>> USER --> SMTP --> INTERNET (servers without problems, smth auth or pop
>>>> before smtp)
>>>> INTERNET --> MX (smtp) --> MAILDIR (servers with problems)
>>>>
>>>> MX = SPAMDYKE - QMAIL-SMTP
>>>>
>>>> If you (any of you), send an email to me, you will use YOUR smtp
>>>> server, and then YOUR server (qmail-send, by example), connect to MY
>>>> MXs servers (another smtp) and sent the mail to me, BUT if yoy are a
>>>> SPAMMER and look for MX records on any DNSs, youy can "test" if this
>>>> MXs records (smtp servers) accept mail to "everybody", if this is the
>>>> case, then this MXs will be used as OPEN RELAY
>>>> Qmail control these with rcpthost, and I think that spamdyke do the
>>>> same, but, I get sorprised when the a mail for NON local domain was
>>>> accepted
>>>>
>>>> Please, do a manual test with this config files and then tell me if
>>>> I'm wrong or what I have missconfigured
>>>>
>>>> Connected to [YOUR MX!!!! SERVER]
>>>>
>>>> Telnet xxxxxxxx 25
>>>>
>>>> After : 220 response
>>>> SEND: helo xxxx
>>>> After : 250 response
>>>> SEND: MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (use any email account)
>>>> After : 250 response
>>>> SEND: RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (any email account that CAN'T be
>>>> found on rcpthost)
>>>>
>>>> If qmail is controlling the session
>>>>
>>>> RESPONSE: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts
>>>> (#5.7.1)
>>>>
>>>> If spamdyke 4 with or without access-file control the session
>>>>
>>>> RESPONSE: 220 OK
>>>>
>>>> Type QUIT to close
>>>>
>>>> I hope you can't help me
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>> Pablo Murillo #!/bin/sh
>>>> QMAILDUID=`id -u qmaild`
>>>> NOFILESGID=`id -g qmaild`
>>>> MAXSMTPD=`cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming`
>>>>
>>>> if [ -z "$QMAILDUID" -o -z "$NOFILESGID" -o -z "$MAXSMTPD" ]; then
>>>>    echo QMAILDUID, NOFILESGID, or MAXSMTPD is unset in
>>>>    echo /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run
>>>>    exit 1
>>>> fi
>>>> exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -a 9000000 \
>>>>     /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -H -R -l 0 -x
>>>> /web/vpopmail/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -c "$MAXSMTPD" \
>>>>     -u "$QMAILDUID" -g "$NOFILESGID" 0 25 /usr/local/bin/spamdyke -f
>>>> /web/conf/spamdyke.conf \
>>>>     /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 

_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to