Davide D'AMICO wrote:
> 2008/9/7 Eric Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Davide D'AMICO wrote:
>>> 2008/9/7 Eric Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>> I think I can field this one. ;)
>>>>
>>>> Davide D'AMICO wrote:
>>>>> 1) Isn't more useful to graylist senders using their ip address rather
>>>>> than only its
>>>>> email address, like this:
>>>>> /var/db/spamdyke/graylist/domain/rcpt/sender/ip_sender ?
>>>> Some large (think yahoo, gmail) mailers use server pools. Retries might be
>>>> sent from a different server, causing a message to be graylisted many 
>>>> times.
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I think it'd be ok to use IPs for a type of whitelist after the
>>>> IP has passed graylisting. After all, once an IP has passed for one
>>>> domain/sender, wouldn't it pass for all other domain/senders too? However,
>>>> this adds another level of complexity (a pre- and a passed- gray list,
>>>> sometimes referred to as a dual key). If this proved to be a good method, a
>>>> global whitelist service based on the post-key (simply IP address), sort of
>>>> like RBLSs but RWLs, could be implemented. I don't know if anyone's pursued
>>>> such a thing or not. Seems feasible to me though.
>>> You are right, but server pools are well known (gmail, yahoo, msn and 
>>> others)
>>> and could be easily discovered and included in a whitelist.
>> Yes, but they change, so you'd need some sort of maintenance procedure to
>> keep them up to date. It's a slow moving target, but far from being fixed.
>> Adding a manual maintenance burden is bad. If it were automated though,
>> that'd be ok.
>>
> Graylist uses a timeout (min/max) to reset/delete graylist files, so
> there is no need to use manual maintenance.
> 
> Davide

I was talking about adding them.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to