Hi Sam,

Sam Clippinger schrieb:
> The last timeout bug (that I know of) was fixed in 3.1.8. I haven't
> received any reports of timeout problems in 4.0 (yet). If you can
> trigger this problem with 4.0, please try to capture a full log and
> let's arrange some way to get it to me (my server won't accept 50 MB
> emails, sorry).

The problem occured with spamdyke 4.0.3, I'm currently running 4.0.4.

It happened when sending to a specific target mail server, but this 
should be irrelevant because the mail gets accepted into the qmail-queue 
first, so timeouts cannot be triggered by a destination mailserver, right?

I'll check if I can arrange a test with full-log enabled during the next 
few days, when it doesn't hurt productive use of the mta and will report 
back once I got the data.

>
> -- Sam Clippinger

-- Felix Buenemann

> Eric Shubert wrote:
>> Felix Buenemann wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'd like to ask about your opinion on a good value for idle-timeout-secs
>>> – I've started with a value of 60 seconds, which strangely caused
>>> TIMEOUTs during mail delivery of large mails (over 10MB) from clinet
>>> MTAs with SMTP AUTH (specifically the mail path was: Client MS Exchange
>>> (DSL upstream 512 kbps) ->  Spamdyke SMTP AUTH ->  qmail ->  target MTA).
>>>
>>> I have now raised the idle timeout value to 180 secs, which seems to fix
>>> the problem for now, but I wonder what happens with eg. 50 or 100 MB mails.
>>>
>>> The strange thing is that the idle and not the connection timeout got
>>> triggered, because supposedly there is never such a long period of no
>>> traffic during sending a large mail.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>      Felix Buenemann
>>>
>>>
>> What version are you running? There was a bug in most 3.x versions that
>> would timeout on large emails when there was no interruption. Check the
>> documentation's change log to verify which version it was fixed in. There
>> haven't been any reports of this problem with 4.x TTBOMK. Of course, Sam
>> would know for sure.
>>
>>


_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to