Sam, We're using http://www.spamdyke.org/releases/spamdyke-4.0.4.tgz
We never tried Spamdyke before 2 weeks, so 4.0.4 is the sole version we've ever tried. Thanks. ------------------------ Erald Troja Sam Clippinger wrote: > What version of spamdyke are you running right now? Were these files > (that should be directories) created by an older version of spamdyke or > by the version you are now using? > > -- Sam Clippinger > > Erald Troja wrote: >> Sam, >> >> thanks for the reply. I did run with config-test option and I'm seeing >> quite a few errors. >> >> Here's some facts. >> >> 1)/usr/local/bin/spamdyke is set with 755 perms and it's owned by root:root >> >> 2)/var/tmp/spamdyke.graylist.d/ is set with 755 and it's vpopmai:vchkpw >> ownership >> >> 3)any directory within /var/tmp/spamdyke.graylist.d/ is set with 700 and >> vpopmail:vchkpw >> >> 4)my calling line in qmail init script is >> tcpserver -v $RRDNSKEY -R -c $TCP_SERVERS $IPLIMIT >> $RELAYCHKARG -u $USER_VPOPMAIL -g $GROUP_VCHKPW 0 smtp $RBL $SPAMDYKE >> qmail-smtpd vchkpw t >> rue cmd5checkpw true 2>&1 | splogger smtpd & >> >> all in one line. >> >> As far as I can tell the permissions are set properly. >> >> Here's some more discoveries/facts >> >> Here's an entry onto the maillog files >> >> /var/log/maillog.1.bz2:Sep 25 16:11:02 mail01 spamdyke[18977]: ERROR: >> cannot write to graylist file >> /var/tmp/spamdyke.graylist.d/mydomainname.com/webmaster/barb.com/york: >> Not a directory >> >> /var/log/maillog.1.bz2:Sep 25 16:11:02 mail01 spamdyke[18977]: ALLOWED >> from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] origin_ip: >> 89.231.87.134 origin_rdns: host-89-231-87-134.opoczno.mm.pl auth: (unknown) >> >> >> Turns out /var/tmp/spamdyke.graylist.d/mydomainname.com/webmaster/barb.com >> >> is indeed created as a file, when in turn it should have been created >> as a directory. >> >> Also, i'm finding miscellaneous files such as size_447 or size_583 >> inside the /var/tmp/spamdyke.graylist.d/mydomainname.com/webmaster >> directory for one and others as well. >> >> >> Here's the headers from the spam message in FULL. >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Received: (qmail 19015 invoked by uid 399); 25 Sep 2008 16:11:02 -0400 >> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on localhost >> X-Spam-Level: *** >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.4 required=4.0 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR >> autolearn=disabled version=3.1.4 >> X-Virus-Scan: Scanned by clamdmail 0.15 (no viruses); >> Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:11:02 -0400 >> Received: from unknown (HELO host-89-231-87-134.opoczno.mm.pl) >> (89.231.87.134) >> by mail01.myserver.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2008 16:11:02 -0400 >> Received-SPF: none (mail01.myserver.com: domain at barb.com does not >> designate permitted sender hosts) >> identity=mailfrom; client-ip=89.231.87.134; >> envelope-from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> From: =?koi8-r?B?7snLz8zByiD+xcLP1MHSxdc=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: =?koi8-r?B?98HbwSDcxsbFy9TJ187B0SDSxcvMwc3BLg==?= >> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 18:23:44 +0000 >> MIME-Version: 1.0 >> Content-Type: text/plain; >> charset="koi8-r" >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >> X-Priority: 3 >> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 >> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300 >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Can anyone point out where the permission issue might be? >> >> We're using ext3 file system with blocks=1k >> >> config-test shows many 'Not a directory' ERROR warnings. >> >> Please advise. >> >> >> ------------------------ >> Erald Troja >> >> >> Sam Clippinger wrote: >> >>> Something is wrong with the permissions on your graylist folders. >>> spamdyke is not able to see that files exist or it's not able to tell >>> what type of files they are (i.e. directories or regular files). If the >>> folder permissions look correct, it could be a filesystem problem -- >>> I've had to do some special coding for spamdyke on XFS filesystems in >>> the past. You may be able to get more information about what's >>> happening with spamdyke's "config-test" option. >>> >>> When the graylist filter encounters errors like this, spamdyke just >>> skips the graylist filter. The message is processed normally, just as >>> if the graylist filter was not enabled. You might receive more spam as >>> a result but you shouldn't lose any email. >>> >>> -- Sam Clippinger >>> >>> Erald Troja wrote: >>> >>>> Greetings folks, >>>> >>>> fairly new to Spamdyke and we're running on a minimal >>>> configuration such as the one below >>>> >>>> log-level=info >>>> graylist-level=always-create-dir >>>> graylist-dir=/var/tmp/spamdyke.graylist.d >>>> graylist-exception-ip-file=/etc/spamdyke/whitelist.conf >>>> ##all will be graylisted for 15 minutes initial attempt >>>> graylist-min-secs=900 >>>> ##whoever passes graylisting can send for 24 hours >>>> graylist-max-secs=86400 >>>> reject-unresolvable-rdns=true >>>> reject-empty-rdns=true >>>> connection-timeout-secs=2400 >>>> idle-timeout-secs=240 >>>> >>>> >>>> OS is centos 4.6 final and we're utilizing Hsphere qmail binaries from >>>> Psoft. >>>> >>>> We're utilizing 1k blocks on /var/tmp to reduce directory size. >>>> >>>> We've noticed error such as the ones below on our maillog which is >>>> a concern. >>>> >>>> mail01 spamdyke[7232]: ERROR: unable to create directory >>>> /var/tmp/spamdyke.graylist.d/domain.com/user/fromdomain.com: File exists >>>> >>>> mail01 spamdyke[24535]: ERROR: cannot write to graylist file >>>> /var/tmp/spamdyke.graylist.d/domain.com/user/fromdomain.com/windsor: Not >>>> a directory >>>> >>>> I've replaced original domains hosted with us with domain.com and >>>> sending party domains with fromdomain.com >>>> >>>> There's plenty of disk space left on the /var/tmp partition. >>>> >>>> 1.Main question is, why might such be caused and how to avoid it? >>>> >>>> 2.Also what is defined in Spamdyke to happen to such email, is it lost, >>>> is it retried or? >>>> >>>> Thanks and blessings to all involved >>>> with Spamdyke >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> spamdyke-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> spamdyke-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users >> > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
