Please try with:
*.cable.*

d.


2008/10/13 Erald Troja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sam/others,
>
> I've re-read the documentation for this feature over and over
> and as far as I can understand we've done all possible to stop
> the following.
>
> Here's an entry log from a SPAMMER's address we'd like to reject via the
> ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-entry feature.
>
> Oct 13 12:45:21 mail02 spamdyke[12401]: DENIED_GRAYLISTED from:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] origin_ip:
> 80.6.107.90 origin_rdns: cpc1-west2-0-0-cust857.brnt.cable.ntl.com auth:
> (unknown)
>
>
> our ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-entry referenced file contains the
> following
>
>
> cable
> .cable.ntl.com
> .ntl.com
> cable .ntl.com
>
> Seems none of the 4 potential keyword entries we're providing
> is matching the above host name.
>
> The hostname should be rejected with DENIED_IP_IN_RDNS rather
> than DENIED_GRAYLISTED
>
>
> What are we doing wrong?  Or is this a un-discovered bug?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> ------------------------
> Erald Troja
>
>
> Erald Troja wrote:
>> Sam,
>>
>> I'm reading your reply again, and perhaps I misunderstood what
>> you're saying.
>>
>> Here's the entry log for one of the rDNS's I'd like to reject the
>> connection.
>>
>>
>> Oct 13 11:05:41 mail02 spamdyke[29352]: DENIED_GRAYLISTED from:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] origin_ip:
>> 82.19.66.39 origin_rdns: cpc1-rdng9-0-0-cust550.winn.cable.ntl.com auth:
>> (unknown)
>> Oct 13 11:06:23 mail02 spamdyke[31397]: DENIED_GRAYLISTED from:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] origin_ip: 82.19.66.39
>> origin_rdns: cpc1-rdng9-0-0-cust550.winn.cable.ntl.com auth: (unknown)
>>
>>
>> As you will see, there is an IP address for their rDNS.
>>
>> Are you saying that the ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-entry file should
>> also contain the IP address of the originating connection, or as long as
>> their IP resolves to a numeric address, all is necessary to have is the
>> keyword in the ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-entry ?
>>
>> Can anyone clarify this please?
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------
>> Erald Troja
>>
>> Sam Clippinger wrote:
>>> In order for the keyword filter to block connections, spamdyke must
>>> find the keyword and the entire IP address in the rDNS name.  The two
>>> examples you gave don't appear to contain whole IP addresses.  Also,
>>> the second example contains the keyword "cablelink", not "cable";
>>> spamdyke will not match keywords within other text.
>>>
>>> -- Sam Clippinger
>>>
>>> Erald Troja wrote:
>>>> Hello Folks,
>>>>
>>>> We are slowly building up on the many swiss army knife features
>>>> that Spamdyke offers.
>>>>
>>>> One of them is the ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-entry feature
>>>> http://spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#RDNS
>>>>
>>>> In essence, we notice many, next to say almost all connections
>>>> connecting to port 25 of our servers, with the keyword 'cable' are
>>>> of SPAMMY nature and we'd like to stop them.
>>>>
>>>> So, we have Spamdyke configured with
>>>> ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-file=/etc/spamdyke/ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-file
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> and have /etc/spamdyke/ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-file
>>>>
>>>> with one line containing just the keyword
>>>>
>>>> cable
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We do notice logging of a handful of connections yet for example
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> DENIED_GRAYLISTED cpc2-midd9-0-0-cust525.midd.cable.ntl.com
>>>> DENIED_GRAYLISTED cablelink-173-45-65.cpe.intercable.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> are Graylisted instead of being denied connectivity. Can anyone
>>>> pass along some documentation on Spamdyke + keyword processing?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to