Sam Clippinger wrote: > First, I apologize for being so silent lately. I haven't been able to > devote much time to spamdyke over the last month or two. > > Based on the discussion a few months back, the revised TODO list > currently stands thus: > DKIM/SPF > Limited support for examining message headers so some headers could be > logged (e.g. Subject). > Rewriting/adding headers when filters failed instead of rejecting the > message entirely. > Replacing/adding recipients unconditionally (e.g. monitoring employee > email or redirecting addresses) or when filters failed (e.g. sending all > spam to a specific mailbox). > Full logging conditionality, based on IP or rDNS. > Full database support, especially for the graylist filter, to make life > simpler for administrators of large sites. > Automatic whitelisting to allow replies from recipients of outbound email. > Daemon proxy mode to replace tcpserver and make spamdyke usable by > non-qmail sites. > Windows Service mode to make spamdyke usable by Exchange administrators. > Tarpit mode to trap botnet spammers the way LaBrea used to trap Code Red > attackers. > > Should the full logging be moved up?
I would like to see it moved up, after logging limited header (subject) info. There was mention some time ago somewhere of logging some indication of TLS (encryption) being in effect or not. Was that with spamdyke or somewhere else? It'd be very nice to see some indication of TLS being active when it is. Easy to verify a secure transmission that way. This would seem like a fairly trivial thing to do. Maybe "ALLOWED TLS" vs just plain "ALLOWED" in the log message? (I'm guessing/hoping that this wouldn't mess up any log analysis tools) > Current status: the code for recipient validation is complete. I haven't > finished testing it yet, so I can't truthfully say it works under all > circumstances. I've still got a ton of test scripts to write to exercise > the new code. I _am_ working on it, but as my time has diminished, > progress has slowed. > > -- Sam Clippinger Extreme thanks Sam, for everything you do with Spamdyke, which is always top notch! > Eric Shubert wrote: >> I see in the TODO.txt file, for version N+1 a request to limit full >> logging by IP or rDNS name. I'd like to see this given a high priority. >> >> In addition, I'd like to be able to limit by sender domain. Maybe simply >> match the right-hand-most portion of the sender's address? (which could >> be simply domain or entire address) >> >> (FWIW) >> -- -Eric 'shubes' _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
