Possibly yes. The DNS response could be too large for a single UDP 
packet, so the server could be falling back to TCP instead. Since 
spamdyke doesn't do DNS queries over TCP at the moment, it will conclude 
the record is just missing.

This same problem was reported a little while ago and I'm planning to 
address it in an upcoming version.

-- Sam Clippinger

Dominik Dausch wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i’m having a problem with Spamdyke when multiple reverse dns entries 
> exist for a ip. Here is an example log:
>
> Mar 26 06:26:59 wh1 spamdyke[25358]: FILTER_RDNS_MISSING ip: 217.5.180.74
>
> If you check that ip, you see that this ip has 12 ptr records but 
> Spamdyke blocks the message. Did I hit a bug here? J
>
> --
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>
> Dominik Dausch
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>   
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to