> Given that your primary objective seems to be to eliminate any delays > from existing emailers, I suppose this would work for you. > Spammers who > hit sporadically will eventually expire. I just intend to > point out that > persistent spammers who send more often than graylist-max-secs will > continue to pass. Again, this might be livable. I've no idea how > persistent spam generally is.
That's correct, and it's true for the whole graylisting process. There's no difference, to this extend, of enabling it in full at the very beginning or not. Persistent spammers will hit, in any case, but that wasn't what I was trying to solve (as you said, this is something I should consider if it's acceptable or not, but this is another matter, graylisting is what it is, you can take it or leave it as is). Best regards :-) --- David Sanchez Martin Administrador de Sistemas [email protected] GPG Key ID: 0x37E7AC1F E2000 Nuevas Tecnologías Tel : +34 902 830500
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
