No, then DSL Lines will rejected with DENIED_IP_IN_RDNS
Von: Eduard Svarc <[email protected]> Antworten an: <[email protected]>, spamdyke users <[email protected]> Datum: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:05:02 +0200 An: <[email protected]> Betreff: Re: [spamdyke-users] Problem with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS not applied to all connections Doesn't it block all e-mails from these domains? I just want to avoid receiving e-mails from DSL line subscribers who have turned theirs computers into zombies. "Ulrich C. Manns" <[email protected]> wrote on 28.04.2009 10:54:15: > Just enter .net and .com into your blacklist_keywords file > > Von: Eduard Svarc <[email protected]> > Antworten an: <[email protected]>, spamdyke users <spamdyke- > [email protected]> > Datum: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:49:19 +0200 > An: <[email protected]> > Betreff: [spamdyke-users] Problem with DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS not > applied to all connections > > > Looking for clues, > > I would like reject all e-mails from dynamic IPs but seems that > Spamdyke don't recognize all correctly like: > > DENIED_GRAYLISTED from: [email protected] to: > pavel_k...@xxxxxxxx origin_ip: 99.184.238.30 origin_rdns: > adsl-99-184-238-30.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net auth: > > is graylisted instead denied like: > > DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS from: [email protected] to: > sa...@xxxxxxx origin_ip: 91.184.0.35 origin_rdns: 91-184-0-35. > shared.hostnet.nl auth: > > As I see only diference is in 1st case is IP adress entered as > reverse, but still is just plain IP. Seems that some providers > trying to create pseudo FQDNS for theirs dynamic IPs. Denying > dynamic IPs is great feature preventing 99% of spams, but seems it > could be fooled or can be configured even further to intercept is? > > Please Help
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
