In regards to this "Feature", Sam, can you give a brief overview of how you implemented it? Is it similar to the CHKUSR patch that queries VPOPMAIL, or ? I'm trying to decide if I want to wait for it to be included in Spamdyke, or implement to patch to Qmail and not utilize it when it's available in Spamdyke.
Of course, if there's a benefit to doing the check in Spamdyke instead of in Qmail, then that might influence my decision too... Thanks! Mike -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sam Clippinger Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 3:59 PM To: spamdyke users Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] recipient check Yes, this suggestion has come up many times. I'm mostly done with implementing this feature now (though not exactly as you describe it). I have to fix some remaining bugs and finish testing, then it'll be available. -- Sam Clippinger Otto Berger wrote: > Hi all, > > the discussion about this is quite as old as spamdyke. But is there > anything new on this? > > is it maybe a way to provide a simple hook to spamdyke so it can run an > external check-programm or script? That programm could check via a > ENV-vars the recipient-address an return true or false or something. > > recipient-blacklist-plugin=/bin/check_for_invalid_recipient.sh > recipient-whitelist-plugin=/bin/check_for_valid_recipient.sh > > i know its not the best and high performance solution, but maybe > (relative) easy to implement an i think there will be soon much > "plugins" to check valid recipients against databases, files etc... > > Otto > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
