That looks even more strange to me. ;) If you're even authenticated,
you're a "legal" user and should be able to send yourself a mail. I
think i just didn't understand which case you want to block when a mail
has sender=recipient?

Ulrich C. Manns schrieb:
> Yes, but in this case i am authenticated.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Von: *David Stiller <[email protected]>
> *Antworten an: *spamdyke users <[email protected]>
> *Datum: *Thu, 7 May 2009 11:03:49 +0200
> *An: *spamdyke users <[email protected]>
> *Betreff: *Re: [spamdyke-users] Posibility to blacklist messages where
> sender and recipient are exactly same
> 
> Ulrich C. Manns schrieb:
>> @Sam Clippinger
> 
>> Hi Sam,
> 
>> my whishes:
> 
>>    1. A new parameter to reject emails if sender=recipient (because
>>       we?re hosting many domains an Eduard method won?t work for us)
> 
> Hi Ulrich,
> 
> isn't it a quite usual method to send mails to yourself, to keep a copy
> or something? If you really want to do this, check also if the sending
> mx is not local domain, regardings this i would think that spamdyke
> might deny such a mail anyway with the reverse dns lookup checks.
> 
>>    2. SPF .... (DENIED_SPF)
>>    3. MySQL extension from haggybear.de
> 
> 
>> Regards,
>> Ulrich
> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *Von: *Eduard Svarc <[email protected]>
>> *Antworten an: *<[email protected]>, spamdyke users
>> <[email protected]>
>> *Datum: *Wed, 6 May 2009 10:29:11 +0200
>> *An: *spamdyke users <[email protected]>
>> *Betreff: *Re: [spamdyke-users] Posibility to blacklist messages where
>> sender and recipient are exactly same
> 
> 
>> Hi Ulrich,
> 
>> thanks for idea and it works. I did add into
>> /etc/spamdyke.d/sender-blacklist-file all our local domain in form:
> 
>> @intertech.cz
> 
>> and now SPAMDYKE works as I do expecting:
> 
>> May  6 10:23:29 fw spamdyke[27819]: DENIED_SENDER_BLACKLISTED from:
>> [email protected] to: [email protected] origin_ip: 89.189.3.74
>> origin_rdns: lissant.kis.ru auth: (unknown)
> 
>> Heureka! I hope it will helps someone else than me. But it is perfectly
>> what I do expect to happens.
> 
>> Eduard
> 
>> [email protected] wrote on 06.05.2009 09:51:17:
> 
>>>
>>> Dear Ulrich,
>>>
>>> I guess it couldn't be denied by DENIED_IP_IN_RDNS because
>> s0106000625a2b407
>>> is not hexadecimal representation of IP address. I pick may be wrong
>>> example there are partially regular reverse DNS too where sender and
>>> recipent are same like:
>>>
>>> May  6 09:35:03 fw spamdyke[27053]: ALLOWED from: @domain.cz to:
>>> @domain.cz origin_ip: 95.48.168.162 origin_rdns: jum162.internetdsl.
>>> tpnet.pl auth: (unknown)
>>>
>>> Thanks to your answer to another thread I got idea how to block
>>> these messages. I could put our domain in sender-blacklist-file and
>>> it will definetely stop all messages containing SPAM with fake
>>> sender from our domain. Users using another mail server for outgoing
>>> mail and that mail will never reach perimeter SMTP server where
>>> SPAMDYKE does run.
>>>
>>> Thnak you!
>>> Eduard
>>>
>>> "Ulrich C. Manns" <[email protected]> wrote on 06.05.2009 08:59:15:
>>>
>>> > I think this should be a new parameter in the config for the next
>> version?
>>> >
>>> > But this should be rejected with DENIED_IP_IN_RDNS with .net in the file
>>> > ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-file?
>>> >
>>> > Von: Eduard Svarc <[email protected]>
>>> > Antworten an: <[email protected]>, spamdyke users <spamdyke-
>>> > [email protected]>
>>> > Datum: Wed, 6 May 2009 08:32:10 +0200
>>> > An: spamdyke users <[email protected]>
>>> > Betreff: [spamdyke-users] Posibility to blacklist messages where
>>> > sender and recipient are exactly same
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Dears,
>>> >
>>> > I'm looking for right place where I could reject messages containing
>>> > with 100% probability SPAM. These messages I could easily indetify
>>> > as SPAM because sender and recipient are exactly same. My server is
>>> > perimeter SMTP relay only. In this case is not simply possible that
>>> > he could deliver this kind of messages. In case when user of local
>>> > domain acidentaly sending message to self it would be handled by
>>> > main mail server not by perimeter SMTP server.
>>> >
>>> > I would like simply DENY all messages like these:
>>> >
>>> > May  6 06:57:48 fw spamdyke[23773]: ALLOWED from: [email protected] to:
>>> > [email protected] origin_ip: 24.84.53.252 origin_rdns:
>>> > s0106000625a2b407.vc.shawcable.net auth: (unknown)
>>> >
>>> > TIA
>>> > Eduard
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 
> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to