Actually, the keyword filter doesn't match that way.  In order for a 
keyword to match, it must be surrounded by non-alphanumeric characters 
(dots or dashes).  This is because I don't want the keyword "dynamic" to 
be found in a name like "11-22-33-44.nondynamic.example.com", that just 
isn't fair.

Unfortunately this also means more entries in the keywords file.

-- Sam Clippinger

David Mitchell wrote:
> Just a suggestion, but I'm thinking that you could optimise this a bit.
> "dial" will already match "dialin", "dialpool" and "dialup", so there's
> no need to include those three, just "dial". Same with a few of the others.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
> Sam Clippinger wrote:
>   
>> Sure.  Please keep in mind this list works for me, on my server, for my 
>> users.  Your mileage may vary wildly.  You have been warned...
>> ....................................................................................
>> # Actual keywords
>> cable
>> client
>> cm
>> dhcp
>> dial
>> dialin
>> dialpool
>> dialup
>> din
>> dip
>> dip0
>> dup
>> dyn
>> dynamic
>> dynamicip
>> ev1s
>> in-addr
>> modem
>> ppp
>> pool
>> pools
>> reverse
>> user
>>
>> # Specific providers with lots of spammers
>> adsl.totbb.net
>> adsl.proxad.net
>> fbx.proxad.net
>> hinet-ip.hinet.net
>> ip.secureserver.net
>> onocable.ono.com
>> res.rr.com
>> rev.gaoland.net
>> .telebecinternet.net
>> bb.sky.net
>> bb.sky.com
>> ptr.us.xo.net
>> .covad.net
>>
>> adsl dsl .sbcglobal.net
>> adsl dsl .ameritech.net
>> adsl dsl .pacbell.net
>> adsl .bellsouth.net
>> wsip .cox.net
>> hsd1 .comcast.net
>> ....................................................................................
>>
>> -- Sam Clippinger
>>
>> Ronnie Tartar wrote:
>>     
>>> Sam,
>>>
>>> Can you share this list as I would love to make mine even better @ 
>>> filtering.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ronnie
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>>> From: "Sam Clippinger" <[email protected]>
>>> To: "spamdyke users" <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 4:20 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Spam Stats
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> I think you're misunderstanding the keywords feature.  spamdyke does not
>>>> examine message content, so it cannot stop messages that contain
>>>> "Viagra" or any other specific words.
>>>>
>>>> When spamdyke searches for keywords, it looks for those keywords in the
>>>> remote server's rDNS name.  The purpose of the feature is to block
>>>> messages from infected PCs on home cable modems.  Most cable providers
>>>> use a predictable naming scheme for their rDNS names, such as
>>>> "11-22-33-44.dynamic.example.com".  If spamdyke finds a configured
>>>> keyword AND the IP address in the rDNS name, it will block the
>>>> connection.  That's all.
>>>>
>>>> On my server, 30%-50% of all connections are blocked by this filter
>>>> every day.  I use a short list of simple keywords like "dynamic",
>>>> "cable", etc to great effect.
>>>>
>>>> -- Sam Clippinger
>>>>
>>>> Christoph Kuhle (Expat Email Ltd) wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> It appears as if the blacklist_keywords can capture a lot of Spam.  So 
>>>>> far
>>>>> we have nothing in that file.  We are worried about the refusal of emails
>>>>> which may be genuine.  So while we might want to blacklist Viagra, we 
>>>>> would
>>>>> not want to blacklist an email from a medical person, for example, which
>>>>> might refer to Viagra (I'm not even sure that this email will make it to 
>>>>> the
>>>>> list having mentioned that word!).
>>>>>
>>>>> Do people have tried and tested contents of that file which they can 
>>>>> advise
>>>>> on to prevent false positives - because we only show about 50-60% spam 
>>>>> being
>>>>> caught.  I think that is partly because we also have ASL installed which
>>>>> blocks lots before it even gets to the mail queue.  If  we can use the
>>>>> blacklist_keywords effectively, we would love to and look forward to any
>>>>> suggestions from seasoned users.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Christoph
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mirko Buffoni
>>>>> Sent: 01 September 2009 14:27
>>>>> To: spamdyke users
>>>>> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Spam Stats
>>>>>
>>>>> Goods average between 500 and 2000 daily.  Figures are however
>>>>> pretty standard.  Spamdyke filters out about 60k attempts daily.
>>>>> Here are yesterday stats:
>>>>>
>>>>>      Good :   1025 =   0.68 %
>>>>>     Unsure :    183 =   0.12 %
>>>>>      Virus :     62 =   0.04 %
>>>>> BAD Sender:   5114 =   3.40 %
>>>>> BAD  Rcpt :    212 =   0.14 %
>>>>> Pure SPAM :  45997 =  30.56 %
>>>>>    SPAMMER :  97940 =  65.06 %
>>>>>       |
>>>>>       \.............BLACKLISTED_KEYWORD :  29608 =  30.23 %
>>>>>       \..............DENIED_EARLYTALKER :      3 =   0.00 %
>>>>>       \...............DENIED_IP_IN_RDNS :  30447 =  31.09 %
>>>>>       \................DENIED_RBL_MATCH :  23268 =  23.76 %
>>>>>       \.............DENIED_SENDER_NO_MX :  13070 =  13.34 %
>>>>>       \......DENIED_TOO_MANY_RECIPIENTS :      1 =   0.00 %
>>>>>       \....DENIED_UNQUALIFIED_RECIPIENT :      1 =   0.00 %
>>>>>       \.........................TIMEOUT :   1542 =   1.57 %
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>      Total : 150533 = 100.00 %
>>>>>           
>
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>   
_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to