Hi Sam - That is a pretty good synopsis of what he is doing. Doesn't he claim to find *any* sought after data in no more than 7 seeks? Maybe I misread that somewhere. :)
My take on the below would be that if spamdyke remains a qmail-only spam blocker, then going with a cdb-based database would be okay (with the provisos you point out.) But if spamdyke is ultimately going to go mainstream (work for most any MTA), then I'd say pick the database you like the best. Bucky On 10/22/2009 [email protected] wrote: > So I said all that to say this: I don't personally believe CDB files > live up to the hype, nor do I believe they solve any real-world > problems > (they're still binary formats, they can't be shared between servers, > etc) but if people want them I can support them. > _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
