Are you using the reverse DNS check in SpamDyke? If a sending mail server does not have an MX record, you should reject it outright.
That would have stopped this e-mail. If a mail server admin is too incompetent to know that they need to have an MX record for their mail server, they are likely going to be a source for spam anyway, so reject their mail. reject-missing-sender-mx The IP may not have been on a blacklist when you got the mail, but was when Arne checked, so that's not necessarily an indication that your blacklists aren't working...But, it's something to watch. Your relay test isn't valid: <<< 554 Refused. Your sender address has been blacklisted. See: http://www.your-domain-here.com/spam_policy#DENIED_SENDER_BLACKLISTED Shows Spamdyke denied you sending because your IP was blacklisted, not because you couldn't relay. These are different beasts. This does indicate that SpamDyke is working, and is denying you from sending from your IP because it is on a blacklist...This is quite common when testing from home via DSL, Cable or dialup. I would double/triple check your Spamdyke config file for typos. Make sure you haven't fat-fingered anything in /etc/spamdyke.conf or in the sender-blacklist-file location (/var/qmail/antispam/blacklist_senders on my box). Make sure everything is entered correctly. I use to also get e-mails from my domain to my domain, and adding them to the blacklist_senders file stopped it cold. Michael J. Colvin NorCal Internet Services www.norcalisp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:spamdyke-users- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Magnus Ringdahl > Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 6:08 AM > To: spamdyke users > Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke configuration finetuneing > > Hi. > I just recieved a viagra spam again. From my own email address. > > Dec 16 14:11:12 web01 /var/qmail/bin/relaylock[28512]: > /var/qmail/bin/relaylock: mail from 125.178.185.144:3512 (not defined) > Dec 16 14:11:13 web01 spamdyke[28509]: TLS_ENCRYPTED from: (unknown) to: > (unknown) origin_ip: 125.178.185.144 origin_rdns: (unknown) auth: > (unknown) > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[28532]: Handlers Filter > before-queue for qmail started ... > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[28532]: > [email protected] > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[28532]: > [email protected] > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 spf filter[28538]: Starting spf filter... > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 spf filter[28538]: Error code: (2) Could not find > a valid SPF record > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 spf filter[28538]: Failed to query MAIL-FROM: No > DNS data for 'domain.tld'. > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 spf filter[28538]: SPF result: none > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 spf filter[28538]: SPF status: PASS > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-queue[28539]: scan: the > message(drweb.tmp.MdrGAT) sent by [email protected] to > [email protected] is passed > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail: 1260969075.825046 new msg 4254303 > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail: 1260969075.825046 info msg 4254303: bytes > 2349 from <[email protected]> qp 28540 uid 2020 > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-local-handlers[28541]: Handlers Filter > before-local for qmail started ... > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-local-handlers[28541]: > [email protected] > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-local-handlers[28541]: > [email protected] > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail-local-handlers[28541]: mailbox: > /var/qmail/mailnames/domain.tld/kundtjanst > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail: 1260969075.845046 starting delivery 3717: > msg 4254303 to local [email protected] > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail: 1260969075.845046 status: local 1/10 remote > 0/20 > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail: 1260969075.853046 delivery 3717: success: > did_0+0+2/ > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail: 1260969075.853046 status: local 0/10 remote > 0/20 > Dec 16 14:11:15 web01 qmail: 1260969075.853046 end msg 4254303 > > This is the header of the mail: > > Received: (qmail 28540 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2009 14:11:15 +0100 > Received-SPF: none (no valid SPF record) > Received: from unknown (HELO ?125.178.185.144?) (125.178.185.144) > by 1.2.3.4 with (RC4-MD5 encrypted) SMTP; 16 Dec 2009 14:11:15 +0100 > From: Pfizer ® Customer Service <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Special offer [email protected] receive 70% OFF on Pfizer. > > Where 1.2.3.4 is the ip of my pleskserver. Don't know what it means, but > the server is not open for relay. > > Kind Regards. > M > > And i have @domain.tld in blacklisted_senders file. So why the hell does > these keep coming? > > Ulrich C. Manns skrev: > > If your users will use authentification there is no problem by > > blocking subdomains also. ?¿? > > > > You could add /reject-ip-in-cc-rdns/ to your /spamdyke.conf/ also. > > > > Regards, > > Ulrich > > > > Am 16.12.2009 um 07:27 schrieb Magnus Ringdahl: > > > >> Believe me, have hav been reading that documentation many times. > >> This is what i read: > >> "One form of wildcard address is supported. All usernames within a > >> domain (and its subdomains) may be blocked by a line starting with |@|. > >> For example, if the file contained the following entry:| @example.com| > >> spamdyke will block mail to |[email protected]|, > |[email protected]|, > >> |[email protected]|, etc." > >> > >> Kind Regards > >> M > >> > >> Ulrich C. Manns skrev: > >>> Look at the documentation > >>> here: > >>> http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#REJECTING_ADDRESSES > >>> > >>> > >>> Spam comes from /[email protected] > >>> <mailto:/[email protected]> > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>/ > >>> > >>> Add: /sender-blacklist-entry=.artgarfunkel.com/ > >>> or: /[email protected] > >>> <mailto:/[email protected]> > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>/ > >>> to your /spamdyke.conf/ > >>> > >>> Be shure that your user uses authentification! > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Ulrich > >>> > >>> Am 15.12.2009 um 22:36 schrieb Magnus Ringdahl: > >>> > >>>> Hi, and thanks for your reply. > >>>> Should i use a "." instead of a "@" as a wildcard? > >>>> > >>>> Kind Regards > >>>> M > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Ulrich C. Manns skrev: > >>>>> Just add your domain to the senders blacklist with a . as wildchard. > >>>>> Example: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> -> .spam.com > >>>>> > >>>>> Your Users should use authentification. So they can send e-mail > >>>>> through spamdyke. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> Ulrich > >>>>> > >>>>> Am 15.12.2009 um 21:54 schrieb Magnus Ringdahl: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi. > >>>>>> I have been using spamdyke for quite some time now, and it reduces > my > >>>>>> spammails alot. > >>>>>> But it have a hell of a problem with spammers (often viagra) the > >>>>>> spoof > >>>>>> the localdomains. > >>>>>> I often get spammails where the sending address is the same as my > >>>>>> receiving address. > >>>>>> And i dint know how to block them. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I have pasted my configurationfiles so you coould see if there is > >>>>>> some > >>>>>> issues. Using Debian and Plesk 9.2. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> spamdyke.conf > >>>>>> ------------------------------------ > >>>>>> log-level=verbose > >>>>>> filter-level=normal > >>>>>> local-domains-file=/var/qmail/control/rcpthosts > >>>>>> max-recipients=20 > >>>>>> idle-timeout-secs=60 > >>>>>> graylist-level=only > >>>>>> graylist-dir=/var/qmail/spamdyke/greylist > >>>>>> graylist-min-secs=300 > >>>>>> graylist-max-secs=1814400 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> sender-whitelist-file=/var/qmail/spamdyke/whitelisted_senders > >>>>>> rdns-whitelist-file=/var/qmail/spamdyke/whitelisted_rdns > >>>>>> ip-whitelist-file=/var/qmail/spamdyke/whitelisted_ip > >>>>>> > >>>>>> sender-blacklist-file=/var/qmail/spamdyke/blacklisted_senders > >>>>>> recipient-blacklist-file=/var/qmail/spamdyke/blacklisted_recipients > >>>>>> ip-blacklist-file=/var/qmail/spamdyke/blacklisted_ip > >>>>>> dns-blacklist-entry=zen.spamhaus.org > >>>>>> > >>>>>> reject-empty-rdns > >>>>>> reject-unresolvable-rdns > >>>>>> greeting-delay-secs=5 > >>>>>> reject-missing-sender-mx > >>>>>> > >>>>>> policy-url=http://www.your-domain-here.com/spam_policy > >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > - > >>>>>> > >>>>>> smtp_psa > >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> service smtp > >>>>>> { > >>>>>> socket_type = stream > >>>>>> protocol = tcp > >>>>>> wait = no > >>>>>> disable = no > >>>>>> user = root > >>>>>> instances = UNLIMITED > >>>>>> env = SMTPAUTH=1 > >>>>>> server = /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env > >>>>>> server_args = -Rt0 /usr/local/bin/spamdyke -f > >>>>>> /etc/spamdyke.conf /var/qmail/bin/relaylock > >>>>>> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd > >>>>>> /var/qmail/bin/smtp_auth /var/qmail/bin/true > >>>>>> /var/qmail/bin/cmd5checkpw > >>>>>> /var/qmail/bin/true > >>>>>> } > >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The whitelisted_ip file contains the mailservers ip-addresses. > >>>>>> The blacklisted_senders file contains the localdomains > (@domain.tld). > >>>>>> The blacklisted_words contains alot of words like .t-dialin.net, > >>>>>> .t-ipconnect.de, .in-addr.arpa, .dhcp, .net, in-addr.arpa, dhcp, > >>>>>> dynamic, and so on. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I understand the spamdyke filters that they work something like > >>>>>> this. If > >>>>>> the sending server is listed in whitelisted_ip the mail passes the > >>>>>> filter. If its not listed in whitelisted_ip it then checks the > >>>>>> blabklisted_senders if the sending address is listed it drops the > >>>>>> mail. > >>>>>> Is that correct? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Here is a sample of the mail.log of a spammail that in my opinion > >>>>>> should > >>>>>> have been dropped but passes all filters. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:55 web01 spamdyke[24928]: TLS_ENCRYPTED from: > >>>>>> (unknown) to: > >>>>>> (unknown) origin_ip: 80.179.197.221 origin_rdns: > >>>>>> 80.179.197.221.cable.012.net.il auth: (unknown) > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[24946]: Handlers Filter > >>>>>> before-queue for qmail started ... > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[24946]: > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[24946]: > >>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 spf filter[24947]: Starting spf filter... > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 spf filter[24947]: SPF result: neutral > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 spf filter[24947]: SPF status: PASS > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail: 1260895976.491935 new msg 4252544 > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail: 1260895976.491935 info msg 4252544: > >>>>>> bytes > >>>>>> 2246 from <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> qp 24948 uid 2020 > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail-local-handlers[24949]: Handlers Filter > >>>>>> before-local for qmail started ... > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail-local-handlers[24949]: > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail-local-handlers[24949]: > >>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail-local-handlers[24949]: mailbox: > >>>>>> /var/qmail/mailnames/domain.tld/info > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail: 1260895976.515935 starting delivery > >>>>>> 2744: > >>>>>> msg 4252544 to local [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail: 1260895976.515935 status: local 1/10 > >>>>>> remote > >>>>>> 0/20 > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail: 1260895976.523935 delivery 2744: > >>>>>> success: > >>>>>> did_0+0+2/ > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail: 1260895976.523935 status: local 0/10 > >>>>>> remote > >>>>>> 0/20 > >>>>>> Dec 15 17:52:56 web01 qmail: 1260895976.523935 end msg 4252544 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:22:57 web01 /var/qmail/bin/relaylock[6350]: > >>>>>> /var/qmail/bin/relaylock: mail from 125.25.15.31:52521 > >>>>>> (125.25.15.31.adsl.dynamic.totbb.net) > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:22:59 web01 spamdyke[6349]: TLS_ENCRYPTED from: > >>>>>> (unknown) to: > >>>>>> (unknown) origin_ip: 125.25.15.31 origin_rdns: > >>>>>> 125.25.15.31.adsl.dynamic.totbb.net auth: (unknown) > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:01 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[6354]: Handlers Filter > >>>>>> before-queue for qmail started ... > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[6354]: > >>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail-queue-handlers[6354]: > >>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 spf filter[6355]: Starting spf filter... > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 spf filter[6355]: Error code: (2) Could not > >>>>>> find a > >>>>>> valid SPF record > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 spf filter[6355]: Failed to query MAIL-FROM: > No > >>>>>> DNS data for 'domain.tld'. > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 spf filter[6355]: SPF result: none > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 spf filter[6355]: SPF status: PASS > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail-queue[6356]: scan: the > >>>>>> message(drweb.tmp.Wu6OR3) sent by [email protected] > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> to > >>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> is passed > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail: 1260908582.819935 new msg 4253887 > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail: 1260908582.819935 info msg 4253887: > >>>>>> bytes > >>>>>> 2469 from <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> qp > >>>>>> 6357 uid 2020 > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail-local-handlers[6358]: Handlers Filter > >>>>>> before-local for qmail started ... > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail-local-handlers[6358]: > >>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail-local-handlers[6358]: > >>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail-local-handlers[6358]: mailbox: > >>>>>> /var/qmail/mailnames/domain.tld/kundtjanst > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail: 1260908582.855935 starting delivery > >>>>>> 2998: > >>>>>> msg 4253887 to local [email protected] > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail: 1260908582.855935 status: local 1/10 > >>>>>> remote > >>>>>> 0/20 > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail: 1260908582.859935 delivery 2998: > >>>>>> success: > >>>>>> did_0+0+2/ > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail: 1260908582.859935 status: local 0/10 > >>>>>> remote > >>>>>> 0/20 > >>>>>> Dec 15 21:23:02 web01 qmail: 1260908582.859935 end msg 4253887 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> How can i check that smtp_auth is working? Im starting to wonder > that > >>>>>> it's not. > >>>>>> I hope someone have the time to answer. I have been struggling with > >>>>>> this > >>>>>> for a long time withput getting rid of those annoying mails. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Kind Regards > >>>>>> M > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Eduard Svarc skrev: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> these keywords .net and .com are used just for testing if IP is in > >>>>>>> reverse DNS listed. Is not done against normal reverse DNS > >>>>>>> records for > >>>>>>> servers like mail.somedomain.net <http://mail.somedomain.net> > >>>>>>> <http://mail.somedomain.net>. So > >>>>>>> in combination with keyword > >>>>>>> reject-ip-in-cc-rdns and .net in file > >>>>>>> /etc/spamdyke/ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-file it will reject > mail > >>>>>>> from 242-29-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net > >>>>>>> <http://242-29-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net> > >>>>>>> <http://242-29-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net> because that sender will be > >>>>>>> positively tested as not valid reverse DNS. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> use just net without that '.' is not suficient because SPAMDYKE > use > >>>>>>> this '.' as flag for testing end of string only. So listing .com > and > >>>>>>> .net does magic for SPAMDYKE when it testing IP in reverse DNS for > >>>>>>> country code DNS, like .it,, .uk etc it does same for .com and > .net. > >>>>>>> Personally I did add into that file other ones special domains > like > >>>>>>> .eu, .org, .info, .biz. These should not be used by ISP > >>>>>>> providers for > >>>>>>> assigning reverse names, but who knows. Anyway it doesn't hurt my > >>>>>>> configuration and I'm preparded. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Eduard Švarc > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> DATA Intertech s.r.o. > >>>>>>> Kladenská 46 > >>>>>>> 160 00 Praha 6 > >>>>>>> Czech Republic > >>>>>>> tel. +420-235365267, fax +420-235361446 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote on 14.12.2009 > >>>>>>> 09:55:45: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> thanks Eduard Švarc > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Same query as david stiller raised, .com, .net are valid domain > >>>>>>>> right? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> also > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> @400000004b25fa572bd181a4 CHKUSER accepted rcpt: from > >>>>>>>> <fx...@bmelaw. > >>>>>>>> com::> remote <microsof-7b1919:unknown:94.179.29.242> rcpt > >>>>>>>> <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> : found existing recipient > >>>>>>>> @400000004b25fa572bd2316c spamdyke[27021]: ALLOWED from: > >>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> to: > >>>>>>>> [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> origin_ip: 94.179. > >>>>>>>> 29.242 origin_rdns: 242-29-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net > >>>>>>>> <http://242-29-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net> > >>>>>>>> <http://242-29-179-94.pool.ukrtel.net> auth: (unknown) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> the above ip is listed in rbl , > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> IP Address Lookup > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [image removed] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 94.179.29.242 is not listed in the SBL > >>>>>>>> 94.179.29.242 is listed in the PBL, in the following records: > >>>>>>>> PBL239543 > >>>>>>>> 94.179.29.242 is not listed in the XBL > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> this doesnt look like false positive > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> From: Eduard Svarc <[email protected] > >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>>>> To: spamdyke users <[email protected] > >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>>>> Sent: Mon, December 14, 2009 12:48:07 PM > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] spamdyke configuration finetuneing > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I see you have two things out. 1st you using RBLS, that could > give > >>>>>>>> you a lot positive false spam. 2nd you completely have > >>>>>>>> commented out > >>>>>>>> best thing in SPAMDYKE. Is sniffing IPs in reverse DNS. Most of > >>>>>>>> bots > >>>>>>>> and spams comming from Internet zombies. Here are my advices: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> 1 - comment out dns-blacklist-entry=zen.spamhaus.org > >>>>>>>> 2 - uncoment reject-empty-rdns, reject-ip-in-cc-rdns, reject- > >>>>>>>> missing-sender-mx and reject-unresolvable-rdns > >>>>>>>> 3- into /etc/spamdyke/blacklist_recipients add your domain in > >>>>>>>> format > >>>>>>>> @your-domain (it will block all mails like to: n...@your-domain > >>>>>>>> from: > >>>>>>>> n...@your-domain) > >>>>>>>> 4- into /etc/spamdyke/ip-in-rdns-keyword-blacklist-file put these > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> words : > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> dsl > >>>>>>>> .com > >>>>>>>> .net > >>>>>>>> broadband > >>>>>>>> dynamic > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I could guarantee you will fall bellow 1% of SPAM with nearly > zero > >>>>>>>> false positives. Of course someone who can't follow certain > >>>>>>>> guidelines for theirs servers will not be able to send you e- > mails > >>>>>>>> at all. But you can easily handle it by adding IP's in > >>>>>>>> /etc/spamdyke/whitelist_ip or adding senders into > >>>>>>>> /etc/spamdyke/whitelist_senders > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I stop using any RBLS services ages ago, they are way unreliable. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Good luck, > >>>>>>>> Eduard Švarc > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> DATA Intertech s.r.o. > >>>>>>>> Kladenská 46 > >>>>>>>> 160 00 Praha 6 > >>>>>>>> Czech Republic > >>>>>>>> tel. +420-235365267, fax +420-235361446 > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote on 14.12.2009 > >>>>>>>> 07:24:03: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more. > >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list > >>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list > >>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list > >>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- > ---- > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> spamdyke-users mailing list > >>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> spamdyke-users mailing list > >>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>> <mailto:[email protected]> > >>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > >>> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> spamdyke-users mailing list > >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> spamdyke-users mailing list > >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > >> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > spamdyke-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
