Eric Shubert wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
Quoting Eric Shubert <[email protected]>:


I think this is more complicated than it needs to be, and not any more
efficient than the qtp-prune-graylist script
(http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/trac/browser/bin/qtp-prune-graylist). The
script is admittedly a little i/o intensive, but a) some of it is
typically cached, and b) it's not all that slow. Besides which, what's
the problem? It's typically run once a day, and I don't see it impacting
the performance of anything else.
Depends on the scale of your mail server. See this entry from the ChangeLog:

  NOT BACKWARDS COMPATIBLE: Changed the graylist system to create a deeper
directory structure by creating folders for the senders' domain names. This
     will allow busy servers to use graylisting even when the number of sender
     addresses could exceed the number of entries allowed in a folder.  Thanks
     to Trog for suggesting this one.

My mail servers graylisting was hitting filesystem limits in less than 24 hours.

Which limit(s) of which filesystem?

The qtp-prune-graylist script would take much longer than a day to run on my mail server.

Did you run it?
In 'silent' mode?

The first large server it ran on, it processed over 1.1M entries. I don't recall the run time, but I believe it was less than an hour. This was on a filesystem that had run out of inodes.

I'd basically have to run it continuously on my server - it would certainly impact performance.

How many graylist entries do you have?

Alot,,, A bunch ... too many LOL :)
Anyways I am running your prune script now and seems to be running smooth.. I started it at 6pm and its still running. I will post those results when its done. What I am up to is I have finished a nice install on centos5.4 I installed the qtp stuff and all went well. I had to install the multitail seperately unless I missed something during my install but everything is working. I did a qtp-restore on the new machine using my current qtp-backup file. This all went well except I had to copy my tcprules,named.conf named records,httpd.conf, spamassassin rules. I have a mirror image of my existing server with the exception it is shiny and new with all updated packages yaY!! I love SPAMDYKE it SO RULEZ the spam to BOW DOWN:) It has worked so well I totally stand behind it. I am tweaking the perl script for the stats so I can have some mysql db support to add it to my admin site of our noc. I hope to post those changes soon. I am sort of a noob when it comes to perl but I am learning quickly.
--Dave

_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to