It's more than i thought:

[r...@plesk-mail 11:12:33:~]
# grep segf /var/log/messages | grep "Oct 25" | wc -l
6768

# dmesg  | wc -l
2655


I think it got so high as there's someone sending a newsletter.

Am 25.10.2010 um 09:38 schrieb David Stiller:

> Ok, so it's another reason. I've let spamdyke run overnight and i now i have 
> 97 Segfaults again.
> I think it's more than my config-dir, thats just a workarounf for the 
> mail-sending problem.
> So sending mail works, but stillt some spammers get disconnected. :-D Sam 
> just send me your
> IP to access my server.
> 
> -- Dave
> 
> 
> Am 25.10.2010 um 04:41 schrieb Ken S.:
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Sam Clippinger <s...@silence.org> wrote:
>>> Another option, if you don't want to fill your logs with spamdyke
>>> debugging messages, is to enable full logging ("full-log-dir").  The
>>> full logs will always contain every log message from spamdyke's most
>>> verbose setting, even if "log-level" is set to a higher value.  In other
>>> words, you can leave "log-level" set to "info" so your logs will stay
>>> the same, but the full logs will contain the "debug" messages.  If
>>> you're willing, recompiling spamdyke to include "excessive" messages
>>> would be even more helpful, as it outputs data about number of bytes
>>> sent/received.  You could then simply delete all of the full log files
>>> every day until you see a segfault appear in your logs.
>>> 
>>> Thanks for doing this, I look forward to finding out where it's crashing.
>>> 
>>> -- Sam Clipinger
>> 
>> Sam:
>> 
>> I've just switched my logging level back to info and enable the
>> 'full-log-dir' option to start dumping to a directory.  I was going to
>> recompile with the excessive option but when I looked at the output of
>> one of the files in the directory I saw data sizes logged.  Looks like
>> this:
>> 
>> 10/24/2010 22:29:26 FROM CHILD, FILTERED: 14 bytes
>> 250-STARTTLS
>> 
>> 10/24/2010 22:29:26 FROM CHILD TO REMOTE: 16 bytes
>> 250-PIPELINING
>> 
>> 10/24/2010 22:29:26 FROM CHILD TO REMOTE: 14 bytes
>> 250-8BITMIME
>> 
>> 10/24/2010 22:29:26 FROM CHILD TO REMOTE: 19 bytes
>> 250-SIZE 25000000
>> 
>> 
>> Spamdyke hasn't segfaulted since 22:40 EST last Thursday:
>> 
>> Oct 21 22:40:43 mail kernel: spamdyke[2940]: segfault at
>> 0000007fbffbfff8 rip 0000003da6e73013 rsp 0000007fbffe75a8 error 4
>> 
>> I'll keep watching the logs and if it faults again I'll check the
>> files in the full-log-dir and post to this thread.
>> 
>> Thx!
>> -ken
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 10/21/10 12:55 PM, Ken S. wrote:
>>>> I've seen a couple of these segfaults over the past year or two, but
>>>> never really thought much about them until today when I saw three of
>>>> them trip in a little over an hour:
>>>> 
>>>> [r...@mail smtpd]# grep "segfault" /var/log/messages
>>>> Oct 21 12:10:17 mail kernel: spamdyke[12243]: segfault at
>>>> 0000007fbffbfff8 rip 0000003da6e73013 rsp 0000007fbffe75a8 error 4
>>>> Oct 21 12:48:29 mail kernel: spamdyke[24247]: segfault at
>>>> 0000007fbffbfff8 rip 0000003da6e73013 rsp 0000007fbffe75a8 error 4
>>>> Oct 21 13:32:40 rsmail kernel: spamdyke[5630]: segfault at
>>>> 0000007fbffbfff8 rip 0000003da6e73013 rsp 0000007fbffe75a8 error 4
>>>> [r...@mail smtpd]#
>>>> 
>>>> Unfortunately, I don't know enough about segfaults to be able to
>>>> decipher what the output is.
>>>> 
>>>> I thought maybe I would look through my qmail connection log (where
>>>> all the spamdyke stuff logs) and find out what happened at/around the
>>>> segfault happened.  Sadly there is nothing in the logs at these times.
>>>> 
>>>> I've just changed the "log-level" from info to debug in hopes that
>>>> something pertinent will get logged.  If there is anything else that I
>>>> should do to help with this, please let me know.
>>>> 
>>>> Here is some system info:
>>>> 
>>>> [r...@mail smtpd]# /usr/local/bin/spamdyke --version
>>>> spamdyke 4.1.0+TLS+CONFIGTEST+DEBUG (C)2010 Sam Clippinger, samc (at)
>>>> silence (dot) org
>>>> ...
>>>> [r...@mail smtpd]# uname -a
>>>> Linux mail.yyy.zzz 2.6.9-89.0.18.EL #1 Wed Nov 25 06:04:37 EST 2009
>>>> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>> [r...@mail smtpd]#
>>>> [r...@mail smtpd]# cat /etc/redhat-release
>>>> Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 8)
>>>> [r...@mail smtpd]#
>>>> ... (and, yes, I'm not happy that it is a RHES4 box, but that's what I
>>>> have to deal with right now) ...
>>>> 
>>>> -ken
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Have a nice day ... unless you've made other plans.
>> _______________________________________________
>> spamdyke-users mailing list
>> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
>> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spamdyke-users mailing list
> spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
> http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

_______________________________________________
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users

Reply via email to