On 13 Dec 11, Hartmut Wernisch | Domaintechnik.at wrote: > On 13 Dec 11, Eduard Svarc wrote: > > Ah, thats bad. I do use spamassasin as well. These messages are marked as > > junk. I would like to stop accepting these messages completely. These > > messages are spam with 100% probability and can be safely discraded on > > input. At first look I did think that Spamdyke blacklist rule @domain > > don't work, but then I found it only doesn't apply on these reply-to: same > > ways as for addresses from:. I hope new version of Spamdyke can include > > reply-to: into check as well. > > > In my opinion this is an interesting idea worth thinking of! > Should be more or less copy and paste of the sender check part > of spamdyke.
Probably this is wrong, because the info is not available at smtp time. So I don't now the source code if it is suitable for reuse :) Best Hartmut _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
