I know that a local DNS server is virtually required for good performance with spamdyke.
Am curious what you don't like about djbdns? Or what you like better about unbound? unbound looks interesting and is available to me via the FreeBSD ports collection. On 7/13/2012 11:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: >> Is this to say that you used to use djbdns for your caching DNS server >> >but you are going to something else? > Yes. I'm playing with unboundwww.unbound.net > _______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
