Looking at those log messages, I don't think TLS has anything to do with this. spamdyke's log message shows "encryption: (none)", which means TLS is not in use.
When spamdyke logs TIMEOUT, it means the remote server held the connection open too long without sending any data at all. Usually that means the software on the remote server is badly written and it's expecting a very specific message before proceeding. Since it isn't getting that message, it just waits until it the connection times out. There's an FAQ about this too: http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/FAQ.html#TROUBLE3 Documentation on how to adjust spamdyke's timeouts is here: http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#TIMEOUTS By default, spamdyke doesn't enforce any timeouts, so another line in your config file must be enabling them. Perhaps simply increasing those values will solve this? If that doesn't help, I'd suggest using spamdyke's full logging feature to capture one of these failed connections. That will show exactly what's data is being sent and how long it's taking. -- Sam Clippinger On Oct 12, 2016, at 2:31 PM, marek--- via spamdyke-users <email@example.com> wrote: > I read an old thread on this problem, but did not see a solution. > # spamdyke -v > spamdyke 5.0.1+TLS+CONFIGTEST+DEBUG+EXCESSIVE (C)2015 Sam Clippinger, samc > (at) silence (dot) org > # uname -a > Linux mail.xxxxx.xx 2.6.18-308.13.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 21 17:10:06 EDT 2012 > i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux > > In spamdyke.config > > tls-level=smtp > tls-certificate-file=/var/qmail/control/servercert.pem > > The problem is TLS TIMEOUT > 2016-10-08 21:04:50.283975500 CHKUSER accepted sender: from > <xx...@ergohestia.pl::> remote <smtp.ergohestia.pl:unknown:184.108.40.206> > rcpt <> : sender accepted > 2016-10-08 21:05:51.280337500 spamdyke: TIMEOUT from: > xx...@ergohestia.pl to: (unknown) origin_ip: 220.127.116.11 origin_rdns: > smtp1.hestia.pl auth: (unknown) encryption: (none) reason: TIMEOUT > > Add adress to whitelist_senders nothing change :( > > I try also on spamdyke 4.3 before upgrade to 5.1 it’s the same. > I don’t any idea how to make to allow this mail. > > Any help will be appreciated > _______________________________________________ > spamdyke-users mailing list > firstname.lastname@example.org > http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
_______________________________________________ spamdyke-users mailing list email@example.com http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users