Hola lista, Cameron nos invita a firmar la siguiente carta abierta que se va a enviar a los miembros con derecho a voto del OGC(*) y también a añadir contenido a la lista de Concerns.
Para firmar deberéis estar dados de alta en el wiki para poder editar la página. También sería deseable que tuvierais creada vuestra página de usuario (podéis inspiraros en la mía si no se os ocurre que poner) Un saludo, (*) Al parecer ESRI ha mandado también correos a los miembros con derecho a voto del OGC explicando sus razones por las que se debería aprobar el estándar. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Cameron Shorter <[email protected]> Date: Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:33 PM Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Would you be concerned if the "GeoServices REST API" became an OGC standard? To: Pedro-Juan Ferrer Matoses <[email protected]> Cc: OSGeo-LocalChapters <[email protected]> Pedro and others, We have created an Open Letter to the OGC and OGC voting members. I'm hoping you will include your name to the list of signatures. You might also want to add content to the list of Concerns: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Geoservices_REST_API#Open_Letter_to_OGC_and_voting_members May 2013 We, the undersigned, have concerns that approving the "Geoservices REST API" as an OGC standard, would have detrimental impacts on interoperability within the spatial industry. We strongly urge that the proposed "Geoservices REST API", as it stands in May 2013, be rejected as an OGC standard. People have listed different reasons for concern. They are described below. ... On 07/05/13 16:58, Pedro-Juan Ferrer Matoses wrote: Hello, I've made a brief summary of this thread and sent it to the Spanish Local Chapter mailing list linking specially the mail from Cameron[1] that started the conversation. I've tried to encourage them to participate in the debate, right now we are receiving some responses, in spanish in the spanish list, I'm going to wait a couple of days and translate them to english and copy them in Discuss. I think that all the Liaison Officers from the Chapters should do the same and try to make their communities aware of this situation. Bests, [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/2013-May/011599.html On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:34 PM, Adrian Custer <[email protected]> wrote: Hey Ann, all, On 5/6/13 5:48 PM, Anne Ghisla wrote: Stephan, Adrian: is there an effective way for OSGeo to address a statement to OGC, beside the official requests for comments and our Discuss list? Thanks for your thoughts, Anne Any official statement issued by the OSGeo Board or community on this particular vote should probably be addressed to the 'Voting Members of the OGC Technical Committee' since they are the ones who are taking a position during this vote and deciding whether to accept it or not as an official OGC standard. The statement could be sent via Carl Reed, who is the head of the OGC Technical Committee. He lurks on this list as part of the collaboration agreement between the two communities and can be reached directly at: creed U+0040 opengeospatial.org ciao, ~adrian _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- Cameron Shorter Geospatial Solutions Manager Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050 Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254 Think Globally, Fix Locally Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source http://www.lisasoft.com -- Pedro-Juan Ferrer Matoses Valencia (España) _______________________________________________ Spanish mailing list http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/spanish http://es.osgeo.org http://twitter.com/osgeoes
