Maybe they are looking into seeing the pros and cons of Snow Leopard sync.
On Sep 1, 10:18 pm, DYP <[email protected]> wrote: > the fact that noone from SpanningSync is responding to these questions > is making me think that there's a good chance that Snow Leopard has > indeed made Spanningsync obsolete. > > On Sep 1, 11:51 am, mapin0518 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I'm wondering the same... does Spanning Sync offer any advantage over > > the built-in Snow Leopard sync? > > > I hope so because I have a lifetime license to Spanning Sync :) > > > But one less clutter on my menu bar using up resources is always > > welcome... > > > On Aug 28, 7:08 pm, Ara <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I found that in Snow Leopard's Address Book, there is an option to > > > synchronize with google under Preferences -> Accounts. With iCal, you > > > can add an account under Preferences -> Accounts -> + -> Account Type > > > "Google". Both of these seem to have good, 2 way synchronization. > > > I'm not trying to drop a bomb on Spanning Sync, but can you tell me > > > specifically why Spanning Sync is better than the built in Snow > > > Leopard options? Or has the need for Spanning Sync come to an end > > > with Snow Leopard? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Spanning Sync" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spanningsync?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
