Played with Calendar Cleaner as well. Same exact "all-size fits all" problem. I find the OS X "Conflict Resolver" interface a whole lot more intuitive, and it allows choices on a case-by-case basis.
Sorry guys, but this just isn't worth paying for. On Sep 24, 11:41 am, Damian <[email protected]> wrote: > I scanned my contacts out of curiousity, and I come up with a number > of conflicts in several categories. I have two contacts which are > listed with just one name. One of them is someone ("Joe") whose last > name I don't know, and the other one is my voicemail access number. > > For Joe, I choose "use '???' instead of the empty name" to fill in his > surname field. Then for the other (voicemail), I choose "Convert to a > company contact", which seems appropriate. So far so good -- except > that when I scroll back up to Joe, the resolution for his contact is > now set to what I chose for voicemail. > > In other words, not only does Contact Cleaner not offer a way to > resolve each conflict individually, but the UI tricks the user into > thinking they're setting a resolution for each conflict individually. > What if I'd chosen to delete Joe because I don't need his number? I'd > have also deleted my voicemail access number. Not good. And doubly bad > because you're charging your subscribers $15 for this package. It > makes me wonder what other pitfalls are built in. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Spanning Sync" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spanningsync?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
