My last question, a perhaps less constructive one, why isn't this more widely used? There are so many people running OpenBSD on Linux KVM, I would think that this is the solution they have been looking for.
Thanks again, already read the manual for ldomctl, plan on finishing reading Sun's docs next. -jf -----Original Message----- From: "Paolo Aglialoro" <paol...@gmail.com> Sent: 4/7/2015 9:46 AM To: "sparc@openbsd.org" <sparc@openbsd.org> Subject: Re: ldom question It works wonderfully, thanks to Mark's beautiful job. Use man ldomctl as a starting point. Il 07/apr/2015 15:07, "Jeremiah Ford" <m...@jeremiahford.com> ha scritto: > > Thanks. The T series seems plentiful enough on eBay... Is this feature stable enough for production in OpenBSD? > > Please forgive my any questions. > > -jf > ________________________________ > From: Paolo Aglialoro > Sent: 4/7/2015 4:47 AM > To: sparc@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: ldom question > > Yes it's full virtualization, but it won't work on a V120. You need a T1000 > or above. > > Il 07/apr/2015 02:26, "Jeremiah Ford" <m...@jeremiahford.com> ha scritto: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I am very new to sparc systems, and only just recently acquired a sunfire > v120. > > > > I have also just recently discovered ldoms, which I find very interesting. > > > > My questions are: > > > > - Does OpenBSD's ldoms work just the same as Solaris ldoms? ((I ask > because the man pages seem very minimal. It appears I need to read Sun's > docs to understand these ... Correct me if I am wrong, please)) > > > > - Is this considered full virtualization? I was under the impression > openbsd did not have , nor like virtualization. > > > > -JF > >
