On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 22:22:24 -0600 "Tom 'spot' Callaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 15:32 -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > > > I disagree with Tom's patch in that it puts this huge switch() > > statement inline. The whole point of BTFIXUP_HIGH() is that it > > resolves the call to a single instruction which can be easily > > patched at runtime. > > > > If it's going to expand to multiple BTFIXUP_HIGH() calls and a > > switch statement, just make it a normal BTFIXUP() to a function > > and place the implementation in sun4c.c and sun4m.c > > How about this instead? Perfect Tom. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
