From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 13:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 23:21:44 +0300 (EEST)
>
> > The newly merged XVR-500 and XVR-2500 drivers both seem to have
> > PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_3DLABS, 0x7a2) (XVR-500) support in pci device
> > table. Is this correct?
> >
> > Just curiously reading new drivers,
>
> Thanks for catching this.
>
> Originally I handled both chips in one driver, then I split
> them up, that's why it was there. I'll fix that up :)
Here is that fix I will push to Linus, thanks again.
commit de9f0cf93fcbccc2de4e6bcb5ef90f997616be3b
Author: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon May 7 14:02:51 2007 -0700
[VIDEO] sunxvr2500: Fix PCI device ID table.
Noticed by Meelis Roos.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/video/sunxvr2500.c b/drivers/video/sunxvr2500.c
index 4010492..4316c7f 100644
--- a/drivers/video/sunxvr2500.c
+++ b/drivers/video/sunxvr2500.c
@@ -237,14 +237,14 @@ static void __devexit s3d_pci_unregister(struct pci_dev
*pdev)
}
static struct pci_device_id s3d_pci_table[] = {
- { /* XVR-2500 */
- PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_3DLABS, 0x0032),
- .driver_data = 1,
- },
- { /* XVR-500 */
- PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_3DLABS, 0x07a2),
- .driver_data = 0,
- },
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_3DLABS, 0x002c), },
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_3DLABS, 0x002d), },
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_3DLABS, 0x002e), },
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_3DLABS, 0x002f), },
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_3DLABS, 0x0030), },
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_3DLABS, 0x0031), },
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_3DLABS, 0x0032), },
+ { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_3DLABS, 0x0033), },
{ 0, }
};
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
