On Wed, 2 May 2007 00:08:31 +0100 (BST) Mark Fortescue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> >
> >> I have attached a patch (so pine does not mangle it) for linux-2.6.20.9.
> >> Is this what you had in mind?
> >>
> >> For linux-2.6.21, more work will be needed as it has more code calling
> >> ptep_set_access_flags.
> >
> > I'm not 100% sure we need the 'update' argument... we can remove the
> > whole old_entry, pte_same, etc... and just have pte_set_access_flags()
> > read the old PTE and decide wether something needs to be changed or not.
> >
> > Ben.
> >
> >
>
> The attached patch works on sun4c (with my simple ADA compile test) but
> the change in functionality may break things other platforms.
>
> The advantage of the previous patch is that the functionality is only
> changed for sparc sun4c so less testing would be required.
>
> Regards
> Mark Fortescue.
>
> [Update-MMUCache-2.patch TEXT/PLAIN (10.7KB)]
> diff -ruNpd linux-2.6.20.9/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> linux-test/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> --- linux-2.6.20.9/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h 2007-05-01
> 12:57:56.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-test/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h 2007-05-01 23:13:23.000000000
> +0100
> @@ -30,10 +30,17 @@ do {
> \
> * to optimize this.
> */
> #define ptep_set_access_flags(__vma, __address, __ptep, __entry, __dirty) \
> -do { \
> - set_pte_at((__vma)->vm_mm, (__address), __ptep, __entry); \
> - flush_tlb_page(__vma, __address); \
> -} while (0)
> +({ \
> + int __update = !pte_same(*(__ptep), __entry); \
> + \
> + if (__update) { \
> + set_pte_at((__vma)->vm_mm, (__address), __ptep, __entry); \
> + flush_tlb_page(__vma, __address); \
> + } else if (__dirty) { \
> + flush_tlb_page(__vma, __address); \
> + } \
> + __update; \
> +})
We never seemed to reach completion here?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
