On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:19:12PM +0100, Martin Habets wrote: > I understand it slows down things a lot. Do you mean it has no > run-time value when debugging suspected MM problems? I do get > different output: unhandled paging request with strict MM checking > versus a DMA error without. > Now for the new patch attempt: > Turning on STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS in include/asm/page.h causes some > build errors for sparc32. This patch against 2.6.21 fixes these.
Unhandled paging request vs. DMA errors? This sounds ominous. What CPU type? -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
