> So Ben suggested what we really want is two routines,
> of_get_pci_dev_node() and of_peek_pci_dev_node() - the former returning
> a refcounted copy and the latter allowing you to "peek" at the
> device_node as long as you own the pci_dev.
> 
> I'm not sure it's worth the churn really, so we should probably just
> document that pci_device_to_OF_node() is contrary, and any users that
> need a reference can take one explicitly.

Yeah, I pretty much made the same decision a couple of years ago which
is why it's still the way it is now :-)

Cheers,
Ben.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to