Hi Dave, Thanks for your interest in iProphet. At some point I decided to disable the NSE model, since the way it was implemented it was semantically closer to Number of Sibling MS/MS Runs rather than Number of Sibling Experiments, and in that form it was not very effective and I decided to roll that into the NRS model (Number of Replicate Spectra) by not requiring that Replicate Spectra counts come from the same run or experiment anymore. It is still helpful to use the -X flag to label experiments in case there is a spectrum name collision between experiments. (iProphet uses the experiment label and spectrum name combination to identify same spectra searched with different methods).
We have a plan to implement a true NSE model in iProphet at which point we'll make another release. Please let me know if you'd like to test a pre-release version. Cheers, -David On 11/25/08, dctrud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've noticed that in the TPP 4.1.1 release, the NSE model is disabled > in InterProphet.cxx, and there is an SVN comment for this: > > "Disable NSE model, instead use the NRS model to represent all > replicates." > > Two lab groups here are interested in combining results from replicate > experiments, and I've been adding this functionality to our front end > for the TPP tools. I was wondering whether the NSE model is disabled > for good, or if I should keep using xinteract -X experiment labels, > and be able to store NSE model info and graphs (from ProphetModels.pl) > in case it returns? > > Many Thanks, > > Dave Trudgian > University of Oxford > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
