Dear David and Eric

Thanks for your replies and suggestions. I thought that I might be able to 
increase identification by accepting hits with lower thresholds. I do 
understand what you mentioned here.

Thanks again,
Ali

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 1:57:38 PM UTC-5, Eric Deutsch wrote:
>
> In the ideal case where the PeptideProphet and iProphet had perfect 
> discriminating power, i.e. the correct and incorrect PSM distributions do 
> not overlap, you would expect a large peak at P=0 and P=1 and nothing in 
> between. As a dataset diverges from this ideal and the correct and 
> incorrect distributions begin to overlap, you will still have very large 
> peaks near P=0 and near P=1, with a small number of intermediate values 
> where the probability is between 0 and 1.
>
>  
>
> So, in short, your distribution is exactly what you would expect based on 
> what you did. It is indicative of a great dataset. You should follow 
> David’s suggestion, and then if you replot, you will see huge peaks at 0 
> and 1 with rather little in between.
>
>  
>
> Regards,
>
> Eric
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* [email protected] <javascript:> [mailto:
> [email protected] <javascript:>] *On Behalf Of *David 
> Shteynberg
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 03, 2017 10:36 AM
> *To:* spctools-discuss
> *Subject:* Re: [spctools-discuss] PeptideProphet/iProphet Probability 
> Distribution
>
>  
>
> These results are showing you that iProphet has great discriminating power 
> even when you restrict the input to only non-low probability PSMs 
> (filtering with PeptideProphet probability).  The best way to run iProphet 
> is to give it all the data from PeptideProphet (use a PeptideProphet 
> minimum probability of 0).
>
>  
>
> -David
>
>  
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Ali <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
> Dear all
>
>  
>
> I am plotting the distribution of the assigned PeptideProphet and iProphet 
> probabilities to my search results. I am seeing a rather strange pattern 
> shown below. Why am I seeing so many hits with very high confidence 
> (probability >0.98) but suddenly after that threshold the number of 
> assigned probabilities to the PSMs decrease abruptly? What could be the 
> reason for this pattern? One would expect to see all ranges of 
> probabilities for PSMs.
>
>  
>
>
> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-BeikGpozjkw/WGsygFV83UI/AAAAAAAABAg/DcG6lRxucM4IRclvdadal-eFSaA05sd6QCLcB/s1600/Picture1.png>
>
>  
>
>  
>
> This figure is the combination of different search engines:
>
> - Comet (min PepPro=0.5)
>
> - X! Tandem GPM (min PepPro=0.05)
>
> - X! Tandem TPP (min PepPro=0.05)
>
>  
>
> The horizontal axis is between 0.5 and 1.
>
>  
>
> and I can see the same pattern for the PeptideProphet distribution of each 
> one of these search engine results including SpectraST (Except for X! 
> Tandem GPM).
>
>  
>
> Thank you very much,
>
>  
>
> Ali
>
>  
>
>  
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "spctools-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <javascript:>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>  
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "spctools-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <javascript:>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to