I really need to learn more! Completely in bewilderment. Actually x!tandem 
gave me a search result and peptideprophet went well. Maybe I got wrong 
totally

在 2017年4月7日星期五 UTC+8下午12:40:01,Eric Deutsch写道:
>
> Yes, but note that the documentation you quote is for SILAC data. While in 
> your original message, you were asking about iTRAQ data. SILAC and iTRAQ 
> are completely different. These SILAC settings don’t apply to iTRAQ. Unless 
> you’re combining the two..
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* richard chiang [mailto:[email protected] <javascript:>] 
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 6, 2017 9:03 PM
> *To:* spctools-discuss <[email protected] <javascript:>>
> *Cc:* [email protected] <javascript:>
> *Subject:* Re: [spctools-discuss] Parameters in X!tandem inputfile for 
> itraq 8
>
>  
>
> Thank you! I am not quite understand your meaning. I just modified it 
> according follows, although I am not sure if it was right.
> residue, modification mass <http://www.thegpm.org/TANDEM/api/rmm.html>:
>
> In order to facilitate the analysis of SILAC data, the capability of 
> having multiple sets of modifications analyzed simultaneously has been 
> added. To specify additional sets of modifications, use the same parameter 
> name with the addition of an incrementing count (starting at 1): 
>
>
>     residue, modification mass 1 
>     residue, modification mass 2 
>     ... 
>     residue, modification mass N
> I will do a further reading to bettter understand it. And your anwser give 
> me another  confussion,if a signal modification is enough, how should the 
> libra program to differentiate the proteins for quantification later.
> 在 2017年4月7日星期五 UTC+8上午10:53:51,Eric Deutsch写道:
>
> Hi, I don’t think that will get you anything useful, although you could 
> try it to see if you get anything that way. All you want is a single 
> modification on n-term and K as in the other thread.
>
>  
>
> I’m guessing what happens is that the reporter ions like to hold the 
> charge and most peptides will still fragment somewhere along the backbone. 
> So.. if the reporter ion stays attached, then you see the mass of both the 
> reporter and balance group plus residues until the break. But, if the 
> reporter ions breaks off, then the charge stays on the reporter ion and you 
> see it, while the molecule with the residues plus the balance group has no 
> charge and so you don’t see it. So the molecules you’re thinking of are 
> there, but they rarely carry a charge so you don’t see them. That’s my 
> guess. If anyone who really knows can set us straight, that would be great.
>
>  
>
> Regards,
>
> Eric
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> *On Behalf Of *richard chiang
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 6, 2017 7:16 PM
> *To:* spctools-discuss <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [spctools-discuss] Parameters in X!tandem inputfile for itraq 8
>
>  
>
>  Hi,
>  I am trying to anlysis itraq8 Ms/Ms data with xtandm, and got confused by 
> a previouse disscussion iTRAQ data through xtandem! using TPP. 
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/spctools-discuss/tandem$20parameters%7Csort:date/spctools-discuss/e4wihr_i8JE/1SNYto9jMVgJ>
> Should not the parameters in tandem.paraams.xml like follows,since balance 
> groups have been removed by the second Ms
>
> <note type="input" label="residue, modification mass">57.0...@C</note>
>       <note type="input" label="residue, potential modification mass">
> 15.9...@M,8.014199@K,10.008269@R</note>
>     <note type="input" label="residue, modification mass 1">113@K</note>
>     <note type="input" label="residue, modification mass 2">114@K</note>
>     <note type="input" label="residue, modification mass 3">116@K</note>
>     <note type="input" label="residue, modification mass 4">117@K</note>
>     <note type="input" label="residue, modification mass 5">118@K</note>
>     <note type="input" label="residue, modification mass 6">121@K</note>
>     <note type="input" label="residue, potential modification 
> motif"></note>
>         <note> You can specify a variable modification only when present 
> in a motif. For instance, 0....@N!{P}[ST] is a deamidation modification 
> on N only if it is present in an N[any but P][S or T] motif (N-glycosite). 
> </note>
>     <note type="input" label="protein, N-terminal residue modification 
> mass 1">113@K</note>
>     <note type="input" label="protein, N-terminal residue modification 
> mass 2">114@K</note>
>     <note type="input" label="protein, N-terminal residue modification 
> mass 3">116@K</note>
>     <note type="input" label="protein, N-terminal residue modification 
> mass 4">117@K</note>
>     <note type="input" label="protein, N-terminal residue modification 
> mass 5">118@K</note>
>     <note type="input" label="protein, N-terminal residue modification 
> mass 6">121@K</note>
>
> Sincerely, 
> Richard
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "spctools-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to