Yes this release is from code revision 7625 which includes Jimmy's patch.

-David

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Jimmy Eng <[email protected]> wrote:

> Alejandro,
>
> I don't know what made it into the 5.1.0-rc1 binary so I can't answer that
> question.  Someone at ISB will hopefully be able to chime in.
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Alejandro <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jimmy,
>>
>> Is this fix included in the 5.1 release candidate that is available at
>> the sourceforge Sashimi page? TPP_Setup_5.1.0-rc1.exe
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Alejandro
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 at 10:37:10 PM UTC+2, Jimmy Eng wrote:
>>>
>>> Oded,
>>>
>>> I just checked in a fix for the issue.  It will hopefully be available
>>> in the next TPP 5.1.0 release whenever that happens.
>>>
>>> Jimmy
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Oded <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi there,
>>>> I am trying to do run a quantitative analysis of dimethylated samples
>>>> labelled on N-term and lysine (using either trypsin or ArgC) using TPP ver5
>>>> on Windows.
>>>> I ran X!Tandem or Comet searches using fixed light di-Met modification
>>>> of Lys and N-term (+28.03) and the Heavy-Light delta (6.031) as variable
>>>> modifications as explained here, and I used successfully before.
>>>> Quantification with XPRESS run without any error but the ratio
>>>> calculation seems to be correct only for peptides that contain a lysine
>>>> (regardless if they were heavy or light). The ratio calculated for peptides
>>>> that do not contain lysines is correct only for the light labelled ones but
>>>> for the heavy ones the program seems to consider them as light peptides and
>>>> searches for peaks that are +6 heavier in order to calculate the ratio.
>>>> For example if we got the peptide AAAHTSPR  that was identified in the
>>>> light dimethylation on the N-term, MH= 838.4530) the program will look for
>>>> the heavy couple at the right place (MH=844.4848) but if the same peptide
>>>> was identified in its heavy form (MH 838.4530) it seems like the program is
>>>> looking for the heavy partner at 844.4848.
>>>> Another minor (?) comment is that running such searches with X!tandem
>>>> seems to mark the heavy N-term dimethylation in a different way than it
>>>> used to before (and currently appear in Comet pepxml) add looks like this:
>>>> n7.04A99.07TAGDTHLGGEDFDNR (instead of n35.07
>>>> <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi?CMD=Web&LAYOUT=TwoWindows&AUTO_FORMAT=Semiauto&ALIGNMENTS=50&ALIGNMENT_VIEW=Pairwise&CDD_SEARCH=on&CLIENT=web&COMPOSITION_BASED_STATISTICS=on&DATABASE=nr&DESCRIPTIONS=100&ENTREZ_QUERY=%28none%29&EXPECT=1000&FILTER=L&FORMAT_OBJECT=Alignment&FORMAT_TYPE=HTML&I_THRESH=0.005&MATRIX_NAME=BLOSUM62&NCBI_GI=on&PAGE=Proteins&PROGRAM=blastp&SERVICE=plain&SET_DEFAULTS.x=41&SET_DEFAULTS.y=5&SHOW_OVERVIEW=on&END_OF_HTTPGET=Yes&SHOW_LINKOUT=yes&QUERY=ATAGDTHLGGEDFDNR>
>>>> ATAGDTHLGGEDFDNR.
>>>> <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi?CMD=Web&LAYOUT=TwoWindows&AUTO_FORMAT=Semiauto&ALIGNMENTS=50&ALIGNMENT_VIEW=Pairwise&CDD_SEARCH=on&CLIENT=web&COMPOSITION_BASED_STATISTICS=on&DATABASE=nr&DESCRIPTIONS=100&ENTREZ_QUERY=%28none%29&EXPECT=1000&FILTER=L&FORMAT_OBJECT=Alignment&FORMAT_TYPE=HTML&I_THRESH=0.005&MATRIX_NAME=BLOSUM62&NCBI_GI=on&PAGE=Proteins&PROGRAM=blastp&SERVICE=plain&SET_DEFAULTS.x=41&SET_DEFAULTS.y=5&SHOW_OVERVIEW=on&END_OF_HTTPGET=Yes&SHOW_LINKOUT=yes&QUERY=ATAGDTHLGGEDFDNR>
>>>> I hope you can advise.
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Oded
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "spctools-discuss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "spctools-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to