Hi David, thanks for the quick reply.

I think I see now.  When there is some ambiguity which prevents determining a 
precise peptide sequence, for example incomplete fragment ion series, or 
isobaric AA assignments etc. then there must be a probability calculation 
performed, the result of which attempts to assign this peptide to the more 
likely protein candidate.  The result of which is recorded in the "total num 
peptides" value.  In the case of a tie, is the value added to all possible 
protein hits or not used?

Thanks a bunch!

Brian
________________________________
From: 'David Shteynberg' via spctools-discuss 
<[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2023 12:37 PM
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [spctools-discuss] ProteinProphet output number of unique peptides 
vs total number of peptides

Hello Brian,

Thanks for the discussion.  The way this is possible is because there are 
degenerate peptides that map to multiple proteins, in which case only those 
that have sufficient weight will be counted as "is contributing evidence" 
peptides.  Only those PSM  instances that are contributing evidence are counted 
in the "tot num peps" value.   Please let me know if further clarification 
would be helpful or if you have other questions.

Cheers,
-David

On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 9:27 AM Hampton, Brian 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello David,

I have difficulty understanding this.  I had always operated under the 
assumption that the "num unique peps" would be less than or equal to the "tot 
num peps" - because - I thought "tot num peps" = "num unique peps" + number of 
(shared) peptides also mapping to given protein.  Is this not the case and if 
so how would "tot num peps" ever be less than "num unique peps"?

Best regards,
Brian




Brian Hampton
Proteomics Core Lab

Center for Vascular and Inflammatory Diseases

University of Maryland School of Medicine

BioPark One Rm 307

800 West Baltimore Street

Baltimore, MD. 21201

(410)706-8207

________________________________
From: 'David Shteynberg' via spctools-discuss 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2023 11:33 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [spctools-discuss] ProteinProphet output number of unique peptides 
vs total number of peptides

Hi Murielle,

Sorry this is a little confusing.  Column "num unique peps" represents total 
number of unique peptides mapping to the protein.  The "tot num peps" counts 
the PSMs that are "contributing evidence" (last column) to the protein, 
sometimes this number can be lower because not all peptides mapping are 
contributing evidence and spectral counts can be low per peptide.

The answer to your second question is yes, the "tot num peps" is the spectral 
count for "is contributing evidence" peptides.

Cheers,
-David


On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 7:27 AM 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi David,

Thank you for such a quick reply!

I used tpp version 6.2.0 run via a singularity image and I produced the table 
by including the EXCELXX option in proteinprophet.

Cheers,

Murielle

On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 12:44:03 AM UTC+2 David Shteynberg wrote:
Hi Murielle,

Thanks for using the TPP and submitting your question here.   When I try the 
latest version of the TPP and run ProteinProphet through there, the columns 
exported in my tab separated file from ProteinProphet are different from yours. 
 Can you please provide a bit more information about how you generated this 
file and which version of the software you used?

Cheers,
-David

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 7:10 AM [email protected] <[email protected]> 
wrote:
Hi all,

I have two questions concerning the output of ProteinProphet :

1) Why do I have some entries for which the total number of peptides is lower 
than the number of unique peptides?  (see columns 5 and 6 below, an extract of 
my output table)

[protein prophet output.jpeg]
2) Does the column "total number of peptides" correspond to spectral counts?

Thank you very much ,

Murielle

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/be3b35c9-e308-4e35-8551-03425f7d1704n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/be3b35c9-e308-4e35-8551-03425f7d1704n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/04691060-aedc-4d65-87a0-ae40aa92f889n%40googlegroups.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/04691060-aedc-4d65-87a0-ae40aa92f889n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/CAGJJY%3D9cFy1deU1TrZzMRyJ7GqTX4ZX-bByL6GDFj6ZEcU6Kug%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/CAGJJY%3D9cFy1deU1TrZzMRyJ7GqTX4ZX-bByL6GDFj6ZEcU6Kug%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/BL0PR03MB4259C80B5A47840AFEEB12948924A%40BL0PR03MB4259.namprd03.prod.outlook.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/BL0PR03MB4259C80B5A47840AFEEB12948924A%40BL0PR03MB4259.namprd03.prod.outlook.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/CAGJJY%3D8eH7q7L7moDYWT7vgmgJrFtJpdyyS4ZZbuX4Ygy9utuQ%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/CAGJJY%3D8eH7q7L7moDYWT7vgmgJrFtJpdyyS4ZZbuX4Ygy9utuQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/BL0PR03MB42598ECFAC9E9948FA1D53908924A%40BL0PR03MB4259.namprd03.prod.outlook.com.

Reply via email to