Thanks Luis. I have asked this on the COMET group as well. They will probably come up with an update or something to enable it. On Tuesday, August 1, 2023 at 8:47:46 AM UTC+5:30 Luis Mendoza wrote:
> Hi Debojyoti, > Yes, I would say this is the most straightforward way of conducting this > search. > Note that you may need to make further adjustments to the variable mod > string settings if, say, a given peptide must have *all* of its Cysteines > in one state (+50) or the other (+90). The default is to allow for mixed > Cysteines in the peptide, e.g. PEPC[50]TIDEC[90]R. > Hope this helps, > --Luis > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 11:04 AM Debojyoti Pal <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello everyone >> >> I have a specific scenario where I want to search for peptide in which >> cysteine must either have +50 or +90 mod. Basically: >> 1) Cys can only have one of +50 or +90 >> 2) Cys much have one of +50 or +90 (ie It cannot be unmodified) >> >> Only way I can achieve this is to put a static mod of +50 and variable >> mod of +40 (40+50 = +90). Is there any better way to do this. >> >> Regards >> Debojyoti >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "spctools-discuss" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/e4fc0662-b880-4a69-863f-4261444ba547n%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/e4fc0662-b880-4a69-863f-4261444ba547n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/spctools-discuss/b4cd975a-1881-49a0-8a04-684c92bb5ae4n%40googlegroups.com.
