Hi Pete and all, On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:08:30PM +0100, Pete Bunting wrote: > Hi Roberto, > > This was a feature I added in May. It is about rebuilding pulses from > the LAS file. The assumption is that a LAS file is in time order and/or > at least that if a point states that it is point 1 or 3 then then next > three will be 2 or 3 and 3 of 3 etc. Basically, I ran into problems as > I got delivered a file where this had been broken and when SPDLib was > building pulses it was getting some crazy results as it just read point > 1 of 3 and then read the next 3 points and build a pulse rather than > checking the numberings of the those pulses. > > I hope that helps explain the warnings you are seeing. >
I have just confirmed that the LAS files I processed this mornign are already classified and that many returns are missing. Everything makes much more sense now, thank you! Since I cannot do much about the LAS files, I piped the warnings to /dev/null so they are not bothering me "anymore" :P Regards, Roberto -- Roberto Antolín http://twitter.com/#!/tolanss ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ spdlib-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spdlib-develop
