Hi Pete, Are you saying that the only classification that pmf and mcc assign is "ground"? That explains lots of things :)
So, I guess that the data I have with "high vegetation" class was already classified before applying spdpmfgrd and spdmccgrd, right? Then, what happens with spddefheight and spdinterp? I suppose they use ground and no-ground points in order to define the reference surface for height definition and the DSM, DTM and CHM, respectively. Cheers, Roberto 2014-09-24 19:45 GMT+02:00 Pete Bunting <[email protected]>: > Hi Roberto, > > I am not sure what is going on there. There haven’t been any chances to that > code over the period you talk about. However, I think the difference is more > likely to be with your input data. The spdmccgrd and spdpmfgrd commands do > not try to classify vegetation or any other classes only ground but if > returns have a classification before they are entered into spdmccgrd or > spdpmfgrd then only the points which are classified at some point with the > processing as ground are changed. In the final classification not all point > may end up as ground, if they are only ground at an intermediate stage then > those points will be assigned as unclassified. Therefore, you will commonly > see quite a few unclassified returns near the ground. > > If you want to test it or to ‘clean’ your data before using spdlib to > classify it then you can use the spdclearclass command to assign all returns > to the class ‘unclassified’. > > I hope that helps, let me know if it doesn’t make sense or this is not what > you are seeing. > > Cheers, Pete > > > On 24 Sep 2014, at 16:57, Roberto Antolín <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> I have recently noticed that PMF and MCC algorithms do not classify >> vegetation properly. The output spd files has two (some times three) >> different classes: "ground" and "unclassified" ("low vegetation" in >> some rare cases). None of them are "vegetation" >> >> Since I have not updated my spdlib version for a long time, I checked >> the files I processed months ago. As far as I know, this issue is >> going on since May. >> >> Any hint? >> >> -- >> Roberto >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer >> Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports >> Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper >> Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> spdlib-develop mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spdlib-develop > -- Roberto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ spdlib-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spdlib-develop
