>From: W. Trevor King <wk...@tremily.us> >Sent: Friday, March 23, 2018 9:30 PM >To: Kai Koehne >Cc: spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org >Subject: Re: New Exception Request: Qt-GPL-exception-1.0 >> >>On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 03:50:57PM +0000, Kai Koehne wrote: >> >> Exception 1: As a special exception you may create… >> >> >> >> Exception 2: As a special exception, you have permission… >> > >> > I expect commas after “special exception” in both entries, not >> > just for Exception 2. If it's too late to change that everywhere, >> > perhaps we can add an <optional>,</optional> to recommend it going >> > forward while continuing to match the comma-less version? >> >> Good point about the commas, I'll suggest to change this. But this >> will take its time to end up in a released version of Qt. > >So how do you feel about: > > As a special exception<optional>,<optional> you may create > >That means that we recommend folks include a comma, but that we >consider both forms matches for >Qt-GPL-exception-1.0.<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy>
Sounds great! Kai
_______________________________________________ Spdx-legal mailing list Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
