FYI - Just created a pull request to fix the issue where deprecated licenses
were not getting the isFsfFree meta data added:
https://github.com/spdx/LicenseListPublisher/pull/27

Gary

> -----Original Message-----
> From: g...@sourceauditor.com <g...@sourceauditor.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 8:55 AM
> To: 'W. Trevor King' <wk...@tremily.us>
> Cc: 'SPDX-legal' <spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org>
> Subject: RE: Last call for version 3.1 website review
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: W. Trevor King <wk...@tremily.us>
> > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 12:11 AM
> > To: g...@sourceauditor.com
> > Cc: 'SPDX-legal' <spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org>
> > Subject: Re: Last call for version 3.1 website review
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 05:48:07PM -0500, g...@sourceauditor.com
> > wrote:
> > > Please let me know if you know of any issues with the preview
> > > website that could potentially hold up the release.
> >
> > I'd really like to have obsoletedBy exposed [1] to downstream consumers.
> > For example, obsolete-license suggestions in Ruby are blocked by the
> > lack of stable, canonical access to this data [2].  If we can get that
> > information exposed in the next week, I think it's worth pushing the
release
> back.
> > Otherwise, I guess we'll survive for a few more months without it ;).
> >
> [G.O.] Before exposing this, I'd like to get consensus with the tech team
on the
> additional field.  Since this isn't a change to the license list itself
(at least the
> portion visible and readable on the website), I can push a new version
with the
> additional field between license list releases.
> 
> > Comparing the license-list-data diff between v3.0 and the current
> > 31f52f1, I have two minor concerns:
> >
> > * There seems to be missing <p> around the first lines in html/*.html
[3]
> >   html/0BSD.html seems to have lost a <br/> on its first line [3]
> >
> [G.O.] Let me know if this causes a formatting problem.  If so, I'll fix
for this
> release.  Otherwise, I'd like to do a bit more research on what changed
(see PR
> for more info).
> 
> > * While GPL-3.0-only [4] and GPL-3.0-or-later [5] both have isFsfFree
> >   true, the deprecated GPL-3.0 [6] and GPL-3.0+ [7] have it false.  It
> >   looks like I need to add the deprecated + identifiers to the fsf-api
> >   repo, but that repo *is* currently showing GPL-3.0 as libre:
> >
> >     $ curl -s https://wking.github.io/fsf-api/spdx/GPL-3.0.json | jq
.tags
> >     [
> >       "gpl-3-compatible",
> >       "libre"
> >     ]
> >     $ curl -s https://wking.github.io/fsf-api/licenses-full.json | jq
> > '.licenses.GNUGPLv3 | {tags, identifiers}'
> >     {
> >       "tags": [
> >         "gpl-3-compatible",
> >         "libre"
> >       ],
> >       "identifiers": {
> >         "spdx": [
> >           "GPL-3.0-or-later",
> >           "GPL-3.0-only",
> >           "GPL-3.0"
> >         ]
> >       }
> >     }
> May be a generator problem where the deprecated licenses are not updating
the
> property.  I'll look into that.
> 
> Trevor - if you could update the API code and re-generate the JSON file to
pick-
> up the GPL-3.0+ identifier, I'll include the updated tags in the release.
> 
> 
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Trevor
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/spdx/LicenseListPublisher/issues/12
> > [2]: https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/2259#issuecomment-
> > 377790912
> > [3]: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-data/issues/32#issuecomment-
> > 381024177
> > [4]: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-
> > data/blob/master/json/details/GPL-3.0-only.json#L3
> > [5]: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-
> > data/blob/master/json/details/GPL-3.0-or-later.json#L3
> > [6]: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-
> > data/blob/master/json/details/GPL-3.0.json#L3
> > [7]: https://github.com/spdx/license-list-
> > data/blob/master/json/details/GPL-3.0%2B.json
> >
> > --
> > This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG
> > (http://www.gnupg.org).
> > For more information, see
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

_______________________________________________
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal

Reply via email to