On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 01:46:26PM +0200, Till Jaeger via Spdx-legal wrote: > EPL-2.0 exists in two forms as well (with or without Exhibit A > making it compatible to the GPL).
My understanding is that the recommended approach is to use OR [1], e.g.: EPL-2.0 OR GPL-2.0 WITH Classpath-exception-2.0 Perhaps this should be addressed in a <notes> entry in EPL-2.0.xml? Phil had called for that not in [1] but it hasn't happened yet. I'm happy to file a pull request adding the note later in the week if nobody else beats me to it ;). Cheers, Trevor [1]: https://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx-legal/2017-August/002150.html Subject: Re: New License/Exception Request: EPL-2.0 Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:33:22 +0000 Message-ID: <e137e412-e386-4261-b92c-08006001c...@blackducksoftware.com> -- This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org). For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Spdx-legal mailing list Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
