On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 01:46:26PM +0200, Till Jaeger via Spdx-legal wrote:
> EPL-2.0 exists in two forms as well (with or without Exhibit A
> making it compatible to the GPL).

My understanding is that the recommended approach is to use OR [1],

  EPL-2.0 OR GPL-2.0 WITH Classpath-exception-2.0

Perhaps this should be addressed in a <notes> entry in EPL-2.0.xml?
Phil had called for that not in [1] but it hasn't happened yet.  I'm
happy to file a pull request adding the note later in the week if
nobody else beats me to it ;).


[1]: https://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx-legal/2017-August/002150.html
     Subject: Re: New License/Exception Request: EPL-2.0
     Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:33:22 +0000
     Message-ID: <e137e412-e386-4261-b92c-08006001c...@blackducksoftware.com>

This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Spdx-legal mailing list

Reply via email to